Why the Panasonic Lumix S5 is a Great Choice for Vloggers and Content Creators

The Panasonic Lumix S5, a full-frame mirrorless camera launched in September 2020, is a compact powerhouse tailored for vloggers and content creators seeking professional-grade video capabilities and versatility. As one of Panasonic’s most affordable full-frame cameras, it combines advanced video features, robust build quality, and a compact design, making it an excellent choice for creators in Kenya looking to elevate their content. This article explores the Panasonic Lumix S5’s key selling points, competitors, ideal users, drawbacks, and pricing in Kenyan Shillings, drawing on insights from reviews and market data.

Selling Points of the Panasonic Lumix S5 for Vloggers and Content Creators

1. Exceptional Video Capabilities
   The Lumix S5 records 4K/60p video with 10-bit 4:2:0 internal recording (or 4:2:2 via HDMI) and Full HD at up to 180fps for smooth slow-motion effects. It supports V-Log, V-Gamut, and HLG profiles, offering up to 14 stops of dynamic range for cinematic grading flexibility. The 4K/30p mode uses the full sensor width with 6K oversampling, delivering sharp, detailed footage ideal for vlogs, YouTube content, or short films. Firmware updates have added features like RAW video output, enhancing its appeal for professional creators.
2. Full-Frame 24.2MP Sensor
   The 24.2MP full-frame CMOS sensor provides excellent low-light performance (ISO 100–51,200, expandable to 50–204,800) and a wide dynamic range, producing vibrant colors and natural skin tones. This makes it perfect for vloggers shooting in varied lighting conditions, from dimly lit studios to outdoor adventures, with superior image quality compared to APS-C or Micro Four Thirds sensors.
3. 5-Axis In-Body Image Stabilization (IBIS)
   The S5’s 5-stop Dual I.S. 2 (up to 6.5 stops with compatible lenses) ensures smooth handheld footage, crucial for vloggers filming without a gimbal. The stabilization rivals higher-end models, making it ideal for dynamic shoots like travel vlogs or run-and-gun content creation.
4. Fully Articulating Touchscreen
   The 3-inch, 1.84-million-dot vari-angle touchscreen LCD flips out fully, allowing vloggers to frame themselves easily during solo shoots. The high-resolution screen and intuitive touch interface support quick focus adjustments and menu navigation, streamlining workflows for creators on the move.
5. Compact and Durable Design
   Weighing 714g (with battery and card), the S5 is one of the lightest full-frame cameras, offering portability for travel vloggers. Its magnesium alloy body is splash- and dust-resistant, ensuring durability for outdoor shooting in Kenya’s diverse climates, from coastal humidity to highland chill.
6. Professional Audio Features
   The S5 includes a 3.5mm microphone input and headphone jack for high-quality audio recording and monitoring, essential for professional vlogs. It also supports four-channel audio via an optional XLR adapter, catering to creators producing interviews or narrative content with complex audio needs.
7. L-Mount Lens Ecosystem
   The S5 uses the L-Mount, supported by Panasonic, Leica, and Sigma, offering a growing range of high-quality lenses. Affordable options like the Lumix S 20-60mm f/3.5-5.6 provide a versatile zoom range for vlogging, while premium lenses like the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 cater to cinematic shoots. The ecosystem’s versatility suits creators with varied shooting styles.
8. Advanced Connectivity and Streaming
   Built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, paired with the Lumix Sync app, enable seamless file transfers to smartphones for quick social media uploads. The S5 supports USB-C webcam functionality for Full HD streaming and can be powered via USB-C, making it ideal for live content creators on platforms like YouTube or Twitch.

Pricing in Kenyan Shillings

As of August 2025, the Panasonic Lumix S5’s price in Kenya varies based on configuration and retailer, estimated using a conversion rate of 129 KSh/USD from USD pricing:

• Body Only: Approximately KSh 180,600 (approx. $1,400)
• With Lumix S 20-60mm f/3.5-5.6 Lens: Approximately KSh 219,300 (approx. $1,700)
• DC-S5KK Content Creator Kit (20-60mm lens, Sigma 45mm f/2.8, battery grip, tripod): Approximately KSh 258,000–283,800 (approx. $2,000–2,200)

Prices may fluctuate, so check with local retailers like Jiji.co.ke, Zuricart, or CamerasAfrica.com for current deals.

Competitors

The Lumix S5 competes with other full-frame and APS-C mirrorless cameras tailored for vlogging. Here are its key rivals:

1. Sony Alpha a7 IV

• Price: ~KSh 258,000 (body only, $2,000); ~KSh 283,800 (with 28-70mm lens, $2,200)
• Pros: Full-frame 33MP sensor, 4K/60p 10-bit 4:2:2, superior Real-Time Eye AF, wider E-mount lens ecosystem, 5.5-stop IBIS.
• Cons: 4K/60p has 1.5x crop, more expensive, complex menus.
• Why Choose Over S5?: Better autofocus and resolution, but the S5 offers uncropped 4K/60p and more affordable lenses.

1. Canon EOS R6 Mark II

• Price: ~KSh 322,500 (body only, $2,500)
• Pros: Full-frame 24.2MP sensor, uncropped 4K/60p, Dual Pixel AF II, 40fps burst, ergonomic design.
• Cons: More expensive, fewer native RF lenses, potential overheating in 4K.
• Why Choose Over S5?: Superior autofocus and ergonomics, but the S5’s video codecs and IBIS are competitive at a lower price.

1. Nikon Z6 II

• Price: ~KSh 258,000 (body only, $2,000)
• Pros: Full-frame 24.5MP sensor, 4K/60p (1.5x crop), dual card slots, weather-sealed, 14fps burst.
• Cons: Fewer native Z-mount lenses, slower autofocus than Sony or Canon.
• Why Choose Over S5?: Better build and viewfinder, but the S5’s video features and compact size are more vlogger-friendly.

1. Panasonic Lumix GH6

• Price: ~KSh 258,000 (body only, $2,000); ~KSh 335,400 (with 12-60mm lens, $2,600)
• Pros: Micro Four Thirds 25.2MP sensor, 5.7K/60p, 7.5-stop IBIS, active cooling, extensive video codecs.
• Cons: Smaller sensor, less reliable contrast-based autofocus, heavier (823g).
• Why Choose Over S5?: More advanced video specs and unlimited recording, but the S5’s full-frame sensor excels in low light.

Who is the Panasonic Lumix S5 Best For?

The Panasonic Lumix S5 is ideal for:

• Professional Vloggers and Filmmakers: Its 4K/60p, V-Log, and 14-stop dynamic range cater to creators producing cinematic vlogs, YouTube content, or short films.
• Travel Vloggers: The compact design, durable build, and 5-stop IBIS make it perfect for filming in diverse environments, from Kenya’s savannas to urban settings.
• Hybrid Creators: The 24.2MP sensor and 7fps burst suit vloggers who also shoot stills for social media or client work.
• Budget-Conscious Full-Frame Users: Priced lower than many full-frame rivals, it offers professional features for creators upgrading from APS-C or Micro Four Thirds systems.

Drawbacks of the Panasonic Lumix S5

Despite its strengths, the S5 has some limitations:

1. Contrast-Based Autofocus: The S5 uses contrast-detect DFD autofocus, which is less reliable than phase-detect systems in competitors like the Sony a7 IV or Canon R6 II, especially for video tracking. Firmware updates have improved performance, but it can struggle with fast-moving subjects.
2. Limited L-Mount Lens Selection: While growing, the L-Mount ecosystem has fewer options than Sony’s E-mount or Canon’s RF-mount, and premium lenses like Leica APO primes are expensive.
3. No CFexpress Card Support: The S5 uses dual SD card slots (one UHS-II, one UHS-I), which are slower than CFexpress slots in cameras like the Lumix GH6, limiting high-bitrate video workflows.
4. Moderate Battery Life: The DMW-BLK22 battery lasts for about 440 shots or 60–90 minutes of 4K recording, requiring spares for extended shoots, similar to competitors like the Nikon Z6 II.
5. No Active Cooling: Unlike the Lumix GH6, the S5 lacks a cooling fan, leading to potential overheating during prolonged 4K/60p recording in warm conditions, which may affect creators in Kenya’s hotter regions.

Conclusion

The Panasonic Lumix S5 is an outstanding choice for vloggers and content creators seeking a compact full-frame camera with professional video capabilities. Its 4K/60p recording, 5-stop IBIS, V-Log profiles, and durable design make it a versatile tool for cinematic vlogs, YouTube content, and hybrid shooting. Priced between KSh 180,600–283,800 in Kenya, it offers excellent value compared to rivals like the Sony Alpha a7 IV, Canon EOS R6 Mark II, Nikon Z6 II, and Panasonic Lumix GH6, particularly for its low-light performance and affordability. However, its contrast-based autofocus, limited lens selection, and lack of active cooling may push advanced creators toward alternatives like the Sony a7 IV for superior autofocus or the GH6 for advanced video specs.

For professional vloggers, travel creators, and budget-conscious full-frame users, the Lumix S5 is a top-tier option in 2025, delivering pro-grade performance in a portable package. Verify pricing with local retailers like Jiji.co.ke or Zuricart for the latest deals.

NOMA NTV TUESDAY 26TH JULY 2025 FULL EPISODE’

Why the Canon EOS RP is a Great Choice for Vloggers and Content Creators

The Canon EOS RP, a compact full-frame mirrorless camera, has become a favorite among vloggers and content creators due to its affordability, portability, and versatile feature set. Priced competitively in Kenya, it offers an entry point into full-frame photography and videography without breaking the bank. This article explores why the Canon EOS RP is an excellent choice for content creators, its key selling points, competitors, ideal users, drawbacks, and its pricing in Kenyan Shillings.

Selling Points of the Canon EOS RP for Vloggers and Content Creators

1. Full-Frame Sensor for Superior Image Quality
   The Canon EOS RP features a 26.2MP full-frame CMOS sensor paired with a DIGIC 8 image processor, delivering exceptional image quality with vibrant colors and excellent low-light performance. For vloggers, this translates to crisp, cinematic footage with natural skin tones, thanks to Canon’s renowned color science. The full-frame sensor provides a wider dynamic range and better depth of field control, ideal for creating professional-looking videos with a blurred background effect.
2. Lightweight and Compact Design
   Weighing only 485g (including battery and memory card), the Canon EOS RP is one of the lightest full-frame mirrorless cameras available. Its compact dimensions (132.5 x 85 x 70 mm) make it perfect for vloggers who are constantly on the move, whether filming travel vlogs or street content. The ergonomic grip ensures comfort during extended handheld shooting, a critical feature for creators filming themselves.
3. Fully Articulated Vari-Angle Touchscreen
   The 3-inch, 1.04m-dot vari-angle touchscreen LCD is a standout feature for vloggers. The side-swivel design allows creators to monitor themselves while filming, making it ideal for solo vlogging or framing shots from unique angles. The touchscreen also supports touch-and-drag autofocus, enabling quick and intuitive focus adjustments without taking your eye off the viewfinder.
4. Dual Pixel CMOS Autofocus with Eye Detection
   The Canon EOS RP boasts a robust Dual Pixel CMOS autofocus system with 4,779 selectable autofocus points, offering fast and accurate focus tracking. The Eye Detection AF is particularly valuable for vloggers, as it locks onto faces and maintains sharp focus even when the subject is moving. This feature ensures professional-quality footage, especially for talking-head videos or dynamic vlogs.
5. 4K Video Capabilities
   The EOS RP supports UHD 4K video recording at up to 24fps and Full HD 1080p at up to 60fps, providing flexibility for content creators. While the 4K video is cropped (1.6x crop factor), it still delivers sharp, detailed footage suitable for vlogs, tutorials, and short films. The camera also supports 5-axis Dual Sensing IS for smoother video when using compatible lenses, reducing shake during handheld recording.
6. Connectivity for Easy Sharing
   With built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, the EOS RP allows seamless file transfers to smartphones or tablets via the Canon Camera Connect app. This is a game-changer for content creators who need to share content quickly on social media platforms. The camera also features USB-C charging, making it convenient for on-the-go creators to recharge using power banks.
7. RF Lens Ecosystem and EF Lens Compatibility
   The Canon EOS RP uses the RF lens mount, which supports Canon’s growing lineup of high-performance RF lenses. Additionally, with an EF-EOS R adapter, creators can use Canon’s extensive range of EF lenses, offering versatility without needing to invest in new glass. This compatibility makes the EOS RP a cost-effective choice for those already in the Canon ecosystem.
8. Microphone and Headphone Ports
   The inclusion of 3.5mm microphone and headphone jacks is a significant advantage for vloggers. These ports allow for high-quality audio recording and real-time monitoring, essential for producing professional-grade video content.

Pricing in Kenyan Shillings

As of August 2025, the Canon EOS RP’s price in Kenya varies depending on the retailer and whether it includes a lens:

• Body Only: Approximately KSh 89,000–123,000
• With 24-105mm STM Lens: Approximately KSh 162,300–180,000

Prices are subject to change, so it’s advisable to check with local retailers like Zuricart, Cellular Kenya, or Price in Kenya for the most up-to-date pricing.

Competitors

The Canon EOS RP faces competition from other mirrorless cameras in the same price range or with similar features. Here are some key competitors:

1. Sony a6400

• Price: ~KSh 116,000 (approx. $900 USD converted at 129 KSh/USD)
• Pros: APS-C sensor with 24.2MP, 11fps continuous shooting, uncropped 4K video, superior autofocus with real-time tracking, compact design (403g).
• Cons: No in-body image stabilization (IBIS), smaller APS-C sensor compared to full-frame, shorter battery life (~360 shots).
• Why Choose Over EOS RP?: The a6400 is better for fast-action shooting and offers uncropped 4K video, making it a strong choice for videographers prioritizing video quality over sensor size.

1. FUJIFILM X-T30 II

• Price: ~KSh 116,000 (approx. $900 USD)
• Pros: APS-C 26.1MP sensor, 30fps electronic shutter, DCI 4K video at higher bitrates (200 Mb/s), extensive lens lineup, compact and lightweight.
• Cons: No IBIS, fewer autofocus points (425 vs. 4,779), smaller sensor.
• Why Choose Over EOS RP?: The X-T30 II is ideal for creators who prioritize speed and portability and don’t need a full-frame sensor. Its video capabilities are slightly superior for serious videographers.

1. Nikon Z5

• Price: ~KSh 180,000–200,000 (approx. $1,400–1,550 USD)
• Pros: Full-frame 24.3MP sensor, IBIS, dual SD card slots, weather-sealed body, uncropped 4K video (firmware-dependent).
• Cons: More expensive, heavier (675g), slower burst rate (4.5fps).
• Why Choose Over EOS RP?: The Z5 offers IBIS and better weather sealing, making it suitable for creators shooting in challenging conditions, but it’s pricier and less portable.

1. Canon EOS R10

• Price: ~KSh 120,000–140,000 (approx. $930–1,085 USD)
• Pros: APS-C 24.2MP sensor, faster 15fps shooting, uncropped 4K video, lightweight (429g).
• Cons: Smaller sensor, fewer autofocus points than the RP, less dynamic range.
• Why Choose Over EOS RP?: The R10 is a more budget-friendly option with faster performance, ideal for beginners or those who don’t need full-frame capabilities.

Who is the Canon EOS RP Best For?

The Canon EOS RP is ideal for:

• Aspiring Vloggers and Content Creators: Its lightweight design, vari-angle LCD, and Eye Detection AF make it perfect for solo creators filming themselves or creating professional content on a budget.
• Travel Vloggers: The compact size and full-frame sensor are great for capturing stunning visuals on the go, whether for landscapes or cityscapes.
• Canon Enthusiasts: Those already invested in Canon’s EF lenses can use them with an adapter, making the EOS RP a cost-effective upgrade to full-frame.
• Beginners Transitioning to Full-Frame: The user-friendly interface and affordable price point make it an excellent entry-level full-frame camera for creators upgrading from APS-C or smartphone cameras.

Drawbacks of the Canon EOS RP

While the Canon EOS RP is a strong contender, it has some limitations:

1. No In-Body Image Stabilization (IBIS): Unlike competitors like the Nikon Z5 or Sony A7 III, the EOS RP relies on lens-based stabilization or digital IS for video, which may not be as effective for handheld vlogging.
2. Cropped 4K Video: The 1.6x crop in 4K mode reduces the field of view, which can be limiting for wide-angle vlogging. Competitors like the Sony a6400 and FUJIFILM X-T30 II offer uncropped 4K.
3. Short Battery Life: The LP-E17 battery lasts for approximately 250 shots, which is lower than competitors like the Sony a6400 (~360 shots). Vloggers may need to carry spare batteries for extended shoots.
4. Limited Burst Rate: With a maximum of 5fps, the EOS RP is not ideal for fast-action photography, such as sports or wildlife, compared to the Sony a6400’s 11fps or FUJIFILM X-T30 II’s 30fps.
5. Limited Weather Sealing: While the EOS RP has some weather resistance, it’s not as robust as higher-end models or the Nikon Z5, so caution is needed in harsh conditions.

Conclusion

The Canon EOS RP is a compelling choice for vloggers and content creators seeking an affordable, lightweight full-frame camera. Its 26.2MP sensor, Dual Pixel autofocus, vari-angle touchscreen, and connectivity features make it a versatile tool for creating high-quality video content. Priced between KSh 89,000–180,000 in Kenya, it offers excellent value for those transitioning to full-frame or building a portable vlogging setup. However, its lack of IBIS, cropped 4K video, and short battery life may push some creators toward competitors like the Sony a6400, FUJIFILM X-T30 II, Nikon Z5, or Canon EOS R10, depending on their priorities.

For vloggers and content creators who value portability, Canon’s color science, and a user-friendly experience, the EOS RP remains a top contender in 2025, striking a balance between performance and affordability. Always check with local retailers for the latest pricing and availability, as prices can fluctuate.

NOMA NTV MONDAY 25TH JULY 2025 FULL EPISODE’

Samsung QLED QN65C vs. Hisense U8K: A Comprehensive Comparison for the Kenyan Market

For Kenyan consumers seeking a premium television in 2025, the Samsung QLED QN65C (2023 model, e.g., QN65Q60CAFXZA, assuming QN65C refers to the Q60C series) and Hisense U8K (2023 model, e.g., 65U8K), both available in secondary or refurbished markets, offer compelling options in the mid-range and high-end QLED segments. The Samsung QN65C provides reliable performance for casual viewing, while the Hisense U8K delivers superior brightness and contrast for a more immersive experience. This article compares their quality, costs, and target audience, with prices in Kenyan Shillings (KSh) tailored for the Kenyan market, using data from RTINGS.com, Tom’s Guide, and PerfectRec.com.

---

Overview of the TVs

Samsung QLED QN65C

The Samsung QN65C (2023, assumed Q60C-based) is a 4K QLED TV with a VA panel, edge-lit backlighting, and no local dimming. Powered by the Quantum Processor Lite 4K and Tizen OS, it’s designed for streaming and casual use in moderate lighting, available in 32-, 43-, 50-, 55-, 65-, 75-, and 85-inch sizes.

Hisense U8K

The Hisense U8K (2023) is a 4K QLED TV with a VA panel, Mini-LED backlighting, and full-array local dimming (~384 zones for 65-inch). Equipped with the Hi-View Engine and Google TV, it’s optimized for HDR content and gaming, available in 55-, 65-, 75-, 85-, and 100-inch sizes.

---

Quality Comparison

1. Picture Quality

• Samsung QLED QN65C (based on Q60C data from RTINGS.com, Tom’s Guide):
• Panel Type: VA LCD, QLED, edge-lit, no local dimming.
• Brightness: ~450 cd/m² (HDR 10% window), ~400 cd/m² (SDR), suitable for moderate lighting.
• Contrast: ~7,000:1 native, decent blacks but prone to backlight bleed.
• Color Performance: ~87% DCI-P3, vibrant colors with quantum dots.
• Viewing Angles: Narrow (~24°), suited for direct viewing.
• HDR Support: HDR10, HDR10+, HLG (no Dolby Vision).
• Upscaling: Quantum Processor Lite 4K, decent (~6.7/10), adequate for low-quality Kenyan broadcasts.
• Reflections: Good handling (~5.0% total reflections), semi-glossy finish.
• Hisense U8K (based on RTINGS.com, PerfectRec.com):
• Panel Type: VA LCD, QLED, Mini-LED, full-array local dimming (~384 zones).
• Brightness: ~1,800 cd/m² (HDR 10% window), ~600 cd/m² (SDR), excellent for bright rooms.
• Contrast: ~10,000:1 with dimming, deep blacks with minimal blooming.
• Color Performance: ~97% DCI-P3, ~70% Rec.2020, highly vibrant colors.
• Viewing Angles: Narrow (~25°), suited for direct viewing.
• HDR Support: HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG.
• Upscaling: Hi-View Engine, fair (~4.8/10), struggles with low-quality content.
• Reflections: Excellent handling (~2.0% total reflections), anti-reflective coating.

Verdict on Picture Quality: The Hisense U8K outperforms with significantly higher brightness (~1,800 cd/m² vs. ~450 cd/m²), better contrast (~10,000:1 vs. ~7,000:1), and a wider color gamut (~97% vs. ~87% DCI-P3), making it ideal for HDR content in bright Kenyan living rooms. Its ~384 dimming zones minimize blooming, enhancing dark-room performance. The Samsung QN65C offers decent colors and better upscaling (~6.7/10 vs. ~4.8/10) for low-quality local broadcasts, but its edge-lit panel and lack of Dolby Vision limit HDR impact. Both have narrow viewing angles, favoring direct viewing setups. The Hisense’s Mini-LED technology delivers superior visuals.

2. Gaming Performance

• Samsung QLED QN65C:
• Refresh Rate: 60Hz, no 4K/120Hz (HDMI 2.0).
• Input Lag: ~10.0ms (4K@60Hz), responsive for casual gaming.
• Features: ALLM, no VRR or FreeSync.
• Game Mode: Adequate response (~10.0ms 80% response time).
• Hisense U8K:
• Refresh Rate: 144Hz, 4K/120Hz via two HDMI 2.1 ports.
• Input Lag: ~15.0ms (4K@60Hz), ~8.0ms (4K@120Hz), less responsive.
• Features: VRR, ALLM, Game Bar.
• Game Mode: Fast response (~5.0ms 80% response time).

Verdict on Gaming: The Hisense U8K is better for gaming with a 144Hz refresh rate, two HDMI 2.1 ports, and VRR support, making it suitable for PS5/Xbox Series X and PC gaming. The Samsung QN65C’s lower input lag (~10.0ms vs. ~15.0ms) benefits casual gaming, but its 60Hz panel and lack of VRR limit its appeal for next-gen consoles.

3. Sound Quality

• Samsung QLED QN65C: 2.0-channel speakers, 20W output, Object Tracking Sound Lite, adequate (~6.5/10 score).
• Hisense U8K: 2.1-channel speakers, 40W output, Dolby Atmos, good (~7.0/10 score).

Verdict on Sound: The Hisense U8K’s 40W 2.1-channel system with Dolby Atmos delivers more immersive audio than the Samsung QN65C’s 20W setup. A soundbar is recommended for both to achieve cinematic audio in Kenyan homes.

4. Smart Features and Connectivity

• Samsung QLED QN65C: Tizen OS, Bixby/Alexa/Google Assistant, three HDMI 2.0, two USB, Bluetooth 5.2, Wi-Fi 5, AirPlay, SmartThings.
• Hisense U8K: Google TV, Google Assistant/Alexa, four HDMI (two 2.1), two USB, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi 6, Chromecast.

Verdict on Smart Features: The Hisense U8K’s Google TV offers broader app access (>5,000 apps), Wi-Fi 6, and two HDMI 2.1 ports, enhancing gaming and streaming. The Samsung QN65C’s Tizen OS is intuitive with AirPlay and SmartThings, but its HDMI 2.0 ports limit next-gen gaming connectivity. Both support voice assistants, but Hisense’s platform is more versatile.

5. Design and Build

• Samsung QLED QN65C: Slim (~1.0 inch, 65-inch), 0.4-inch bezels, VESA 400×300, ~20.9 kg, good reflections (~5.0%).
• Hisense U8K: Thicker (~2.9 inches, 65-inch), 0.3-inch bezels, VESA 400×300, ~24.9 kg, excellent reflections (~2.0%).

Verdict on Design: The Samsung QN65C’s AirSlim design is sleeker for wall-mounting in Kenyan homes, while the Hisense U8K’s superior reflection handling (~2.0%) and narrower bezels enhance its look in bright settings. The Hisense is slightly heavier and bulkier.

---

Cost Comparison (in Kenyan Shillings)

Prices are estimated based on 2023 pricing, adjusted for 2025 secondary/refurbished markets, using an exchange rate of 1 USD = 130 KSh (as of August 20, 2025, 6:40 PM EAT). Local pricing may vary due to import duties and availability. Check with retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or authorized dealers.

Samsung QLED QN65C Prices (based on Q60C data, RTINGS.com)

• 55-inch: $550–$650 ≈ KSh 71,500–84,500
• 65-inch: $750–$850 ≈ KSh 97,500–110,500
• 75-inch: $900–$1,000 ≈ KSh 117,000–130,000

Hisense U8K Prices (based on RTINGS.com, PerfectRec.com)

• 55-inch: $600–$700 ≈ KSh 78,000–91,000
• 65-inch: $900–$1,000 ≈ KSh 117,000–130,000
• 75-inch: $1,100–$1,200 ≈ KSh 143,000–156,000

Verdict on Cost: The Samsung QN65C is slightly more affordable at smaller sizes (~KSh 71,500–130,000 vs. ~KSh 78,000–156,000), but the Hisense U8K offers better value for its superior features at comparable or lower prices for larger sizes.

---

Target Audience

• Samsung QLED QN65C:
• Ideal For: Budget-conscious families and casual viewers in moderate lighting. Its affordability and upscaling suit streaming and general use in Kenyan homes.
• Use Case: Best for streaming, casual gaming, and low-quality content viewing.
• Budget: KSh 71,500–130,000, for cost-sensitive buyers seeking reliability.
• Hisense U8K:
• Ideal For: Cinephiles and gamers in bright or dark rooms. Its brightness, contrast, and gaming features suit HDR movies and modern consoles.
• Use Case: Ideal for HDR content, gaming, and bright-room viewing.
• Budget: KSh 78,000–156,000, for value-driven buyers seeking performance.

---

Final Verdict

Winner: Hisense U8K

The Hisense U8K is the superior choice for its exceptional brightness (~1,800 cd/m² vs. ~450 cd/m²), higher contrast (~10,000:1 vs. ~7,000:1), and vibrant colors (~97% DCI-P3), delivering stunning HDR visuals ideal for bright or dark Kenyan living rooms. Its ~384 dimming zones, 144Hz refresh rate, and Dolby Vision support enhance HDR and gaming performance, offering excellent value (~KSh 78,000–156,000). Its weaker upscaling (~4.8/10) and narrow viewing angles (~25°) are minor drawbacks.

The Samsung QLED QN65C provides decent colors (~87% DCI-P3), better upscaling (~6.7/10), and lower input lag (~10.0ms), making it suitable for casual viewing and low-quality Kenyan broadcasts. However, its edge-lit panel, lack of Dolby Vision, and 60Hz refresh rate limit its HDR and gaming capabilities, and its pricing (~KSh 71,500–130,000) is less competitive for the performance offered.

Recommendation: Choose the Hisense U8K for vibrant HDR, gaming, and bright-room viewing, with a budget of KSh 78,000–156,000. Opt for the Samsung QLED QN65C for affordable streaming and casual viewing in moderate lighting, with a budget of KSh 71,500–130,000. Verify pricing through Kenyan retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or authorized dealers as of August 20, 2025.

NOMA NTV THURSDAY 21ST JULY 2025 FULL EPISODE

I’ve previously provided a detailed comparison of the LG NanoCell 90T (2024 model, assumed based on NanoCell 90 series) and TCL QM6K Roku TV (2025 model, assumed as QM6K), covering their quality, costs, and target audience with prices in Kenyan Shillings (KSh) for the Kenyan market. To avoid redundancy, I’ll provide a concise, updated article aligned with your request, incorporating the current date and time (07:25 PM EAT, Tuesday, August 19, 2025). If you need specific additions or modifications, please let me know!

---

LG NanoCell 90T vs. TCL QM6K Roku TV: A Comprehensive Comparison for the Kenyan Market

For Kenyan consumers seeking a television in 2025, the LG NanoCell 90T (2024 model, e.g., 55NANO90TUA) and TCL QM6K Roku TV (2025 model, e.g., 65QM6K), available in secondary or refurbished markets, offer contrasting options in the mid-range and budget segments. The LG NanoCell 90T delivers wide viewing angles and gaming features, while the TCL QM6K prioritizes high contrast and affordability with Mini-LED technology. This article compares their quality, costs, and target audience, with prices in Kenyan Shillings (KSh) for the Kenyan market, using data from RTINGS.com, CNET.com, and TechRadar.com.

---

Quality Comparison

1. Picture Quality

• LG NanoCell 90T:
• Panel Type: IPS LCD, NanoCell, full-array local dimming (~32–40 zones).
• Brightness: ~600 cd/m² (HDR), ~450 cd/m² (SDR), for moderate lighting.
• Contrast: ~2,500:1 with dimming, grayish blacks due to IPS.
• Color Performance: ~87% DCI-P3, vibrant colors.
• Viewing Angles: Wide (~70°), ideal for groups.
• HDR Support: HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG.
• Upscaling: α7 Gen 7 AI Processor, good (~6.5/10).
• Reflections: Good handling (~5.0%).
• TCL QM6K Roku TV:
• Panel Type: VA LCD, QLED, Mini-LED, full-array local dimming (~500 zones).
• Brightness: ~600–700 cd/m² (HDR), ~500 cd/m² (SDR), for bright rooms.
• Contrast: ~10,000:1 with dimming, deep blacks.
• Color Performance: ~94.7% DCI-P3, vibrant colors.
• Viewing Angles: Narrow (~25°), for direct viewing.
• HDR Support: HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG, IMAX Enhanced.
• Upscaling: AiPQ Engine, fair (~4.8/10).
• Reflections: Moderate handling (~5.5%).

Verdict: The TCL QM6K excels with higher contrast (~10,000:1 vs. ~2,500:1), deeper blacks, and broader HDR support, ideal for HDR movies in bright or dark Kenyan rooms. The LG NanoCell 90T’s wide viewing angles (~70°) and better upscaling (~6.5/10) suit group viewing and low-quality local broadcasts.

2. Gaming Performance

• LG NanoCell 90T: 120Hz, ~10.0ms input lag (4K@60Hz), VRR, ALLM, two HDMI 2.1 ports.
• TCL QM6K: 144Hz, ~15.0ms input lag (4K@60Hz), VRR, ALLM, two HDMI 2.1 ports.

Verdict: The LG NanoCell 90T is better for gaming with lower input lag (~10.0ms vs. ~15.0ms), ideal for responsive console gaming. The TCL QM6K’s 144Hz refresh rate benefits PC gamers, but its higher input lag is a drawback.

3. Sound Quality

• LG NanoCell 90T: 20W, Dolby Atmos, adequate (~6.5/10).
• TCL QM6K: 20W, Dolby Atmos, DTS Virtual:X, adequate (~6.0/10).

Verdict: Both offer similar audio; LG’s Dolby Atmos slightly enhances immersion. A soundbar is recommended for both.

4. Smart Features and Connectivity

• LG NanoCell 90T: webOS 24, AirPlay 2, four HDMI (two 2.1), two USB.
• TCL QM6K: Google TV, Chromecast, four HDMI (two 2.1), one USB.

Verdict: LG’s webOS is intuitive with AirPlay 2; TCL’s Google TV offers more apps and Chromecast. Both suit streaming and gaming.

5. Design and Build

• LG NanoCell 90T: Slim (~2.3 inches, 65-inch), ~24.5 kg, good reflections (~5.0%).
• TCL QM6K: Thicker (~2.8 inches), ~20.5 kg, moderate reflections (~5.5%).

Verdict: LG’s slimmer design is better for wall-mounting; TCL’s lighter build aids practicality.

---

Cost Comparison (in Kenyan Shillings)

Prices are estimated for 2025 secondary/refurbished markets, using an exchange rate of 1 USD = 130 KSh (as of August 19, 2025, 7:25 PM EAT). Check with retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or authorized dealers.

LG NanoCell 90T Prices

• 55-inch: $900–$1,000 ≈ KSh 117,000–130,000
• 65-inch: $1,100–$1,200 ≈ KSh 143,000–156,000
• 75-inch: $1,500–$1,700 ≈ KSh 195,000–221,000

TCL QM6K Roku TV Prices

• 55-inch: $500–$600 ≈ KSh 65,000–78,000
• 65-inch: $800–$900 ≈ KSh 104,000–117,000
• 75-inch: $1,000–$1,200 ≈ KSh 130,000–156,000

Verdict on Cost: The TCL QM6K is more affordable (~KSh 65,000–156,000 vs. ~KSh 117,000–221,000), offering better value.

---

Target Audience

• LG NanoCell 90T:
• Ideal For: Families and casual gamers in moderate lighting. Its wide angles suit group viewing in Kenyan homes.
• Use Case: Best for sports, news, and gaming.
• Budget: KSh 117,000–221,000, for versatile buyers.
• TCL QM6K Roku TV:
• Ideal For: Budget-conscious cinephiles and gamers in bright/dark rooms. Its contrast suits movies and solo viewing.
• Use Case: Ideal for HDR movies and gaming.
• Budget: KSh 65,000–156,000, for value-driven buyers.

---

Final Verdict

Winner: TCL QM6K Roku TV

The TCL QM6K Roku TV wins for its higher contrast (~10,000:1), vibrant colors (~94.7% DCI-P3), and affordability (~KSh 65,000–156,000), delivering excellent HDR performance for movies and gaming in bright or dark Kenyan rooms. Its ~500 dimming zones and broad HDR support enhance versatility, though its narrow viewing angles (~25°) and weak upscaling (~4.8/10) are limitations.

The LG NanoCell 90T excels with wide viewing angles (~70°) and better upscaling (~6.5/10), ideal for group viewing and low-quality Kenyan broadcasts. Its lower input lag (~10.0ms) suits gaming, but its lower contrast and higher cost (~KSh 117,000–221,000) reduce its value.

Recommendation: Choose the TCL QM6K Roku TV for HDR movies, gaming, and budget-friendly performance, with a budget of KSh 65,000–156,000. Opt for the LG NanoCell 90T for group viewing and low-quality content, with a budget of KSh 117,000–221,000. Verify pricing through Kenyan retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or authorized dealers as of August 19, 2025.

NOMA NTV WEDNESDAY 20TH JULY 2025 FULL EPISODE

Samsung QLED QN65B vs. TCL 5-Series Roku TV: A Comprehensive Comparison for the Kenyan Market

For Kenyan consumers seeking a high-quality television in 2025, the Samsung QLED QN65B (2022 model, e.g., QN65Q60BAFXZA) and TCL 5-Series Roku TV (2022 model, e.g., 55S555), both available in secondary or refurbished markets, offer compelling options in the mid-range segment. The Samsung QN65B, a QLED TV, delivers vibrant colors and gaming features, while the TCL 5-Series, also a QLED with full-array local dimming, emphasizes affordability and HDR performance. This article compares their quality, costs, and target audience, with prices in Kenyan Shillings (KSh) tailored for the Kenyan market, using data from RTINGS.com, BrandChoose.com, and Tom’s Guide.

---

Overview of the TVs

Samsung QLED QN65B

The Samsung QN65B (2022, Q60B series) is a 4K QLED TV with a VA panel, dual-LED edge-lit backlighting, and no local dimming. Powered by the Quantum Processor 4K Lite and Tizen OS, it’s designed for bright rooms, streaming, and casual gaming, available in 43-, 50-, 55-, 60-, 65-, 70-, 75-, and 85-inch sizes.

TCL 5-Series Roku TV

The TCL 5-Series (2022, S555) is a 4K QLED TV with a VA panel, full-array local dimming (~60 zones), and quantum dot technology. Equipped with the AiPQ Engine and Roku TV, it’s optimized for budget-conscious buyers seeking HDR and streaming, available in 50-, 55-, 65-, and 75-inch sizes.

---

Quality Comparison

1. Picture Quality

• Samsung QLED QN65B (based on RTINGS.com, Tom’s Guide):
• Panel Type: VA LCD, QLED, dual-LED edge-lit, no local dimming.
• Brightness: ~450 cd/m² (HDR 10% window), ~350 cd/m² (SDR), suitable for moderately lit rooms.
• Contrast: ~6,000:1 native, good blacks but prone to backlight bleed.
• Color Performance: ~84% DCI-P3, vibrant colors with quantum dots.
• Viewing Angles: Narrow (~24° for color washout), suited for direct viewing.
• HDR Support: HDR10, HDR10+, HLG (no Dolby Vision).
• Upscaling: Quantum Processor 4K Lite, decent (~6.7/10), struggles with low-quality content.
• Reflections: Good handling (~5.0% total reflections), semi-glossy finish.
• TCL 5-Series Roku TV (based on RTINGS.com, BrandChoose.com):
• Panel Type: VA LCD, QLED, full-array local dimming (~60 zones).
• Brightness: ~500 cd/m² (HDR 10% window), ~400 cd/m² (SDR), slightly better for bright rooms.
• Contrast: ~7,000:1 with dimming, deeper blacks with less blooming than edge-lit.
• Color Performance: ~90% DCI-P3, more vibrant colors.
• Viewing Angles: Narrow (~25°), suited for direct viewing.
• HDR Support: HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG, broader streaming compatibility.
• Upscaling: AiPQ Engine, fair (~4.8/10), less effective for low-quality content.
• Reflections: Good handling (~5.0% total reflections), semi-glossy finish.

Verdict on Picture Quality: The TCL 5-Series outperforms with slightly higher brightness (~500 cd/m² vs. ~450 cd/m²), better contrast (~7,000:1 vs. ~6,000:1), and Dolby Vision support, enhancing HDR streaming for platforms like Netflix. Its full-array local dimming (~60 zones) reduces blooming compared to the Samsung’s edge-lit panel, delivering deeper blacks. The Samsung QN65B offers vibrant colors (~84% DCI-P3) and decent upscaling (~6.7/10 vs. ~4.8/10), better for low-quality Kenyan broadcasts, but lacks Dolby Vision. Both have narrow viewing angles, favoring direct viewing setups.

2. Gaming Performance

• Samsung QN65B:
• Refresh Rate: 60Hz, no 4K/120Hz (HDMI 2.0).
• Input Lag: ~10.0ms (4K@60Hz), responsive for casual gaming.
• Features: ALLM, no VRR or FreeSync.
• Game Mode: Adequate for single-player games.
• TCL 5-Series:
• Refresh Rate: 60Hz, no 4K/120Hz (HDMI 2.0).
• Input Lag: ~15.0ms (4K@60Hz), slightly less responsive.
• Features: ALLM, no VRR or FreeSync.
• Game Mode: Decent for casual gaming.

Verdict on Gaming: The Samsung QN65B has a slight edge with lower input lag (~10.0ms vs. ~15.0ms), making it more responsive for casual gaming. Both TVs lack 120Hz and advanced gaming features like VRR, limiting their suitability for next-gen consoles like PS5 or Xbox Series X.

3. Sound Quality

• Samsung QN65B: 2.0-channel speakers, 20W output, Object Tracking Sound Lite, Dolby Digital Plus, adequate (~6.5/10 score).
• TCL 5-Series: 2.0-channel speakers, 20W output, Dolby Atmos, adequate (~6.5/10 score).

Verdict on Sound: Both TVs deliver comparable audio with 20W output, suitable for small rooms but lacking bass. The TCL’s Dolby Atmos support offers slight immersion advantages when paired with a soundbar, while the Samsung’s Object Tracking Sound Lite enhances dialogue clarity. A soundbar is recommended for both to achieve cinematic audio.

4. Smart Features and Connectivity

• Samsung QN65B: Tizen OS, Bixby/Alexa/Google Assistant, three HDMI 2.0, two USB, Bluetooth 5.2, Wi-Fi 5, AirPlay, SmartThings.
• TCL 5-Series: Roku TV, Google Assistant/Alexa, four HDMI 2.0 (one eARC), one USB, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi 5, Chromecast.

Verdict on Smart Features: The Samsung QN65B’s Tizen OS is smooth with SmartThings and AirPlay for smart home integration, but it has fewer HDMI ports. The TCL 5-Series’ Roku TV offers a user-friendly interface with extensive app access and an extra HDMI port, ideal for streaming-heavy users. Both support voice assistants, but TCL’s Chromecast adds casting versatility.

5. Design and Build

• Samsung QN65B: Slim (~2.1 inches, 65-inch), 0.4-inch bezels, VESA 400×300, ~21.8 kg, good reflection handling (~5.0%).
• TCL 5-Series: Thicker (~2.9 inches, 65-inch), 0.4-inch bezels, VESA 300×300, ~18.1 kg, good reflection handling (~5.0%).

Verdict on Design: The Samsung QN65B’s slimmer AirSlim design enhances aesthetics for wall-mounting in Kenyan homes, but the TCL 5-Series is lighter, easing installation. Both handle reflections well, suitable for moderately lit rooms.

---

Cost Comparison (in Kenyan Shillings)

Prices are estimated based on 2022 pricing, adjusted for 2025 secondary/refurbished markets, using an exchange rate of 1 USD = 130 KSh (as of August 18, 2025, 7:31 PM EAT). Local pricing may vary due to import duties and availability. Check with retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or authorized dealers.

Samsung QLED QN65B Prices (based on RTINGS.com, Tom’s Guide)

• 55-inch: $600–$700 ≈ KSh 78,000–91,000
• 65-inch: $800–$900 ≈ KSh 104,000–117,000
• 75-inch: $1,000–$1,200 ≈ KSh 130,000–156,000

TCL 5-Series Roku TV Prices (based on RTINGS.com, BrandChoose.com)

• 55-inch: $400–$500 ≈ KSh 52,000–65,000
• 65-inch: $600–$700 ≈ KSh 78,000–91,000
• 75-inch: $800–$900 ≈ KSh 104,000–117,000

Verdict on Cost: The TCL 5-Series is significantly more affordable (~KSh 52,000–117,000 vs. ~KSh 78,000–156,000), offering better value for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung QN65B’s higher cost reflects its brand premium and slightly better upscaling.

---

Target Audience

• Samsung QLED QN65B:
• Ideal For: Brand-conscious viewers and casual gamers in moderately lit rooms. Its slim design and Tizen OS suit Kenyan homes with smart home setups.
• Use Case: Best for streaming, casual gaming, and low-quality content viewing.
• Budget: KSh 78,000–156,000, for buyers prioritizing brand reliability.
• TCL 5-Series Roku TV:
• Ideal For: Budget-conscious cinephiles and families in bright rooms. Its Dolby Vision and local dimming suit movie-focused setups and streaming.
• Use Case: Ideal for HDR movies, streaming, and general viewing in varied lighting.
• Budget: KSh 52,000–117,000, for value-driven buyers.

---

Final Verdict

Winner: TCL 5-Series Roku TV

The TCL 5-Series Roku TV is the superior choice for its higher brightness (~500 cd/m² vs. ~450 cd/m²), better contrast (~7,000:1 vs. ~6,000:1), and Dolby Vision support, delivering a more vibrant HDR experience for movies and streaming in bright Kenyan living rooms. Its full-array local dimming (~60 zones) reduces blooming, enhancing dark-room performance, and its lower cost (~KSh 52,000–117,000) offers exceptional value. The Roku TV platform’s extensive app access and extra HDMI port add versatility.

The Samsung QLED QN65B provides decent picture quality, better upscaling (~6.7/10 vs. ~4.8/10), and lower input lag (~10.0ms vs. ~15.0ms), making it suitable for low-quality content and casual gaming. Its slimmer design and Tizen OS appeal to brand loyalists, but its lack of Dolby Vision and local dimming limits HDR performance.

Recommendation: Choose the TCL 5-Series Roku TV for affordable, high-quality HDR viewing and streaming in bright or moderate lighting, with a budget of KSh 52,000–117,000. Opt for the Samsung QLED QN65B for casual gaming and brand reliability in dim rooms, with a budget of KSh 78,000–156,000. Verify pricing and availability through Kenyan retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or authorized dealers as of August 18, 2025.

NOMA NTV TUESDAY 19TH JULY 2025 FULL EPISODE

LG OLED evo G2 vs. TCL 6-Series Roku TV: A Comprehensive Comparison for the Kenyan Market

For Kenyan consumers seeking a premium television in 2025, the LG OLED evo G2 (2022 model, e.g., OLED55G2PUA) and TCL 6-Series Roku TV (2021 model, e.g., 55R635), both available in secondary or refurbished markets, represent two distinct approaches to high-quality viewing. The LG G2, an OLED TV, delivers perfect blacks and a gallery-style design, while the TCL 6-Series, a Mini-LED QLED TV, offers bright visuals at a lower cost. This article compares their quality, costs, and target audience, with prices in Kenyan Shillings (KSh) tailored for the Kenyan market, using data from RTINGS.com, HomeTheaterReview.com, and BrandChoose.com.

---

Overview of the TVs

LG OLED evo G2

The LG G2 (2022) is a 4K OLED TV with a WOLED panel, featuring self-lit pixels and the α9 Gen 5 AI Processor. Running on webOS, it’s designed for cinematic viewing and gaming, with a flush wall-mount “Gallery” design, available in 55-, 65-, 77-, 83-, and 97-inch sizes.

TCL 6-Series Roku TV

The TCL 6-Series (2021, R635) is a 4K QLED TV with a VA panel, Mini-LED backlighting, and full-array local dimming (~240 zones). Powered by the AiPQ Engine and Roku TV, it’s a value-driven option for bright rooms and casual use, available in 55-, 65-, and 75-inch sizes.

---

Quality Comparison

1. Picture Quality

• LG OLED evo G2 (based on RTINGS.com, HomeTheaterReview.com):
• Panel Type: WOLED, self-lit pixels, no backlight.
• Brightness: ~800–1,000 cd/m² (HDR 10% window), ~311 cd/m² (SDR real scene), suitable for moderate lighting.
• Contrast: Infinite, perfect blacks with no blooming.
• Color Performance: ~98.76% DCI-P3, ~72.36% Rec.2020, vibrant and accurate (post-calibration dE ~1.02).
• Viewing Angles: Wide (~64° for color washout), ideal for group viewing.
• HDR Support: HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG, enhancing streaming content.
• Upscaling: α9 Gen 5 AI Processor, excellent (~8.8/10), great for low-quality content.
• Reflections: Excellent handling (~1.5% total reflections), glossy finish, ideal for varied lighting.
• TCL 6-Series Roku TV (based on RTINGS.com, BrandChoose.com):
• Panel Type: VA LCD, Mini-LED, full-array local dimming (~240 zones).
• Brightness: ~810 cd/m² (HDR real scene), ~800 cd/m² (SDR sustained 100% window), brighter for well-lit rooms.
• Contrast: ~10,000:1 native, enhanced by dimming, deep blacks with slight blooming.
• Color Performance: ~87.7% DCI-P3, vibrant but less accurate than LG.
• Viewing Angles: Narrow (~24°), suited for direct viewing.
• HDR Support: HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG, matching LG’s streaming compatibility.
• Upscaling: AiPQ Engine, decent (~7.5/10), less effective than LG.
• Reflections: Moderate handling (~6.0% total reflections), semi-glossy finish.

Verdict on Picture Quality: The LG G2 excels with infinite contrast, perfect blacks, and superior color accuracy (~98.76% vs. ~87.7% DCI-P3), ideal for cinematic viewing in darker settings. Its wide viewing angles (~64° vs. ~24°) suit group setups, and its upscaling (~8.8/10 vs. ~7.5/10) enhances low-quality content. The TCL 6-Series offers higher brightness (~810 cd/m² HDR vs. ~800–1,000 cd/m²), making it better for bright Kenyan homes, but its narrower angles and slight blooming limit dark-room performance.

2. Gaming Performance

• LG OLED evo G2:
• Refresh Rate: 120Hz, 4K/120Hz via four HDMI 2.1 ports.
• Input Lag: ~9.9ms (4K@60Hz), ~5.3ms (4K@120Hz), highly responsive.
• Features: VRR, G-SYNC, FreeSync, ALLM, HGiG, sub-1ms response time.
• Game Mode: Gaming Optimizer, ideal for fast-paced games.
• TCL 6-Series:
• Refresh Rate: 120Hz, 4K/120Hz via two HDMI 2.1 ports.
• Input Lag: ~15.0ms (4K@60Hz), less responsive.
• Features: VRR, ALLM, THX Certified Game Mode, no G-SYNC/FreeSync.
• Game Mode: Decent for casual gaming.

Verdict on Gaming: The LG G2 is superior with lower input lag (~9.9ms vs. ~15.0ms), four HDMI 2.1 ports, and broader VRR support (G-SYNC, FreeSync), making it ideal for PS5, Xbox Series X, and PC gaming. The TCL 6-Series supports 4K/120Hz but is less responsive and lacks advanced gaming features.

3. Sound Quality

• LG OLED evo G2: 2.2-channel speakers, 40W output, Dolby Atmos via eARC, AI Sound Pro, good (~7.8/10 score).
• TCL 6-Series: 2.0-channel speakers, 20W output, Dolby Atmos via eARC, adequate (~6.9/10 score).

Verdict on Sound: The LG G2 offers richer audio with higher power (40W vs. 20W) and AI Sound Pro, outperforming the TCL 6-Series’ basic setup. Both benefit from a soundbar for immersive sound.

4. Smart Features and Connectivity

• LG OLED evo G2: webOS, Magic Remote, AirPlay, HomeKit, Google Assistant/Alexa, four HDMI 2.1, three USB, Bluetooth 5.0, Wi-Fi 5.
• TCL 6-Series: Roku TV, Google Assistant/Alexa, four HDMI (two 2.1), one USB, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi 5.

Verdict on Smart Features: The LG G2’s webOS is intuitive with AirPlay/HomeKit and more HDMI 2.1 ports, ideal for gaming and smart homes. The TCL 6-Series’ Roku TV offers a vast app library and user-friendly interface but fewer ports and less customization.

5. Design and Build

• LG OLED evo G2: Ultra-thin (~1.11 inches, 55-inch), 0.3-inch bezels, VESA 300×200, ~17.1 kg (55-inch), glossy finish, excellent reflection handling (~1.5%), Gallery design for wall-mounting.
• TCL 6-Series: Thicker (~2.8 inches, 55-inch), 0.4-inch bezels, VESA 300×300, ~17.7 kg (55-inch), semi-glossy finish, moderate reflection handling (~6.0%).

Verdict on Design: The LG G2’s ultra-thin Gallery design is a premium, art-like centerpiece for Kenyan homes, with superior reflection handling. The TCL 6-Series’ thicker build is sturdy but less elegant, with weaker reflection performance.

---

Cost Comparison (in Kenyan Shillings)

Prices are estimated based on 2022/2021 pricing, adjusted for 2025 secondary/refurbished markets, using an exchange rate of 1 USD = 130 KSh (as of August 17, 2025, 10:00 AM EAT). Local pricing may vary due to import duties and availability. Check with retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or authorized dealers.

LG OLED evo G2 Prices (based on HomeTheaterReview.com, RTINGS.com)

• 55-inch: $1,200–$1,400 ≈ KSh 156,000–182,000
• 65-inch: $1,800–$2,000 ≈ KSh 234,000–260,000
• 77-inch: $2,500–$2,800 ≈ KSh 325,000–364,000
• 97-inch: $8,000–$10,000 ≈ KSh 1,040,000–1,300,000

TCL 6-Series Roku TV Prices (based on RTINGS.com, BrandChoose.com)

• 55-inch: $500–$600 ≈ KSh 65,000–78,000
• 65-inch: $700–$800 ≈ KSh 91,000–104,000
• 75-inch: $1,000–$1,200 ≈ KSh 130,000–156,000

Verdict on Cost: The TCL 6-Series is far more affordable (~KSh 65,000–156,000 vs. ~KSh 156,000–1,300,000), offering exceptional value. The LG G2’s premium pricing, especially for larger sizes, reflects its OLED technology and advanced features.

---

Target Audience

• LG OLED evo G2:
• Ideal For: Cinephiles, gamers, and premium buyers in controlled lighting. Its perfect blacks and gaming features suit dedicated home theaters and gaming setups in Kenyan homes.
• Use Case: Best for movies, gaming, and group viewing in darker rooms.
• Budget: KSh 156,000–1,300,000, for buyers prioritizing top-tier quality.
• TCL 6-Series Roku TV:
• Ideal For: Budget-conscious viewers in bright rooms. Its high brightness and value suit casual movie watching and mixed use.
• Use Case: Ideal for sports, streaming, and casual gaming in well-lit environments.
• Budget: KSh 65,000–156,000, for cost-sensitive buyers.

---

Final Verdict

Winner: LG OLED evo G2

The LG OLED evo G2 is the superior choice for its infinite contrast, perfect blacks, and wide viewing angles (~64° vs. ~24°), delivering an unmatched cinematic experience for movies and gaming in controlled lighting. Its lower input lag (~9.9ms vs. ~15.0ms), four HDMI 2.1 ports, and excellent upscaling (~8.8/10) make it ideal for gamers and group viewing in Kenyan homes. The Gallery design and superior audio (40W vs. 20W) add premium appeal, though its high cost (~KSh 156,000–1,300,000) and moderate brightness limit its use in very bright rooms.

The TCL 6-Series Roku TV excels in bright environments with higher SDR brightness (~800 cd/m² vs. ~311 cd/m²) and affordability (~KSh 65,000–156,000), offering 90% of the premium experience at a fraction of the cost. Its Mini-LED and 240 dimming zones provide strong contrast, but narrower viewing angles and weaker upscaling (~7.5/10) reduce its versatility.

Recommendation: Choose the LG OLED evo G2 for cinematic viewing, gaming, and group setups in controlled lighting, with a budget of KSh 156,000–1,300,000. Opt for the TCL 6-Series for affordable, vibrant visuals in bright rooms, with a budget of KSh 65,000–156,000. Verify pricing and availability through Kenyan retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or authorized dealers as of August 17, 2025.

NOMA NTV MONDAY 18TH JULY 2025 FULL EPISODE

LG OLED evo G1 vs. TCL 5-Series: A Comprehensive Comparison for the Kenyan Market

For Kenyan consumers seeking a high-quality television in 2025, the LG OLED evo G1 and TCL 5-Series (specifically the 2020/2021 R635 model) are two options available in secondary or refurbished markets, each catering to different priorities. The LG G1, a 2021 flagship OLED, offers unmatched contrast and a gallery-style design, ideal for cinematic experiences. The TCL 5-Series, a QLED TV, delivers vibrant colors and impressive value, competing strongly in the mid-range segment. This article compares their quality, costs, and target audience to guide Kenyan buyers, with prices in Kenyan Shillings (KSh) for local relevance.

---

Overview of the TVs

LG OLED evo G1

The LG OLED evo G1 (2021 model, e.g., OLED65G1PUA) is a premium 4K OLED TV featuring a WOLED panel with evo technology for enhanced brightness. Powered by the α9 Gen 4 AI Processor and webOS, it’s designed for wall-mounted, gallery-like aesthetics, offering perfect blacks and wide viewing angles for cinephiles and group viewing.

TCL 5-Series (R635)

The TCL 5-Series (2020/2021 model, e.g., 55R635) is a 4K QLED TV with a VA panel, full-array local dimming, and quantum dots. Running on Roku TV, it’s optimized for budget-conscious buyers seeking vibrant visuals and solid performance in darker rooms, with robust streaming and gaming features.

---

Quality Comparison

1. Picture Quality

• LG OLED evo G1 (based on RTINGS.com, Tom’s Guide data):
• Panel Type: WOLED with evo panel for improved brightness.
• Brightness: ~412 cd/m² (HDR 10% window), suitable for dark to moderately lit rooms but not ideal for very bright environments.
• Contrast: Infinite contrast due to pixel-level dimming, delivering perfect blacks with no blooming.
• Color Performance: Covers ~133.92% of Rec.709 (~96% DCI-P3), with excellent color accuracy (Delta-E ~1.64).
• Viewing Angles: Wide (~47° for color washout), ideal for group viewing.
• HDR Support: Supports HDR10, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, and HLG, enhancing streaming content.
• Upscaling: α9 Gen 4 AI Processor excels at upscaling (~8.5/10), rendering SD/HD content sharply.
• Reflections: Glossy screen with excellent reflection handling (1.5% total reflections), effective in most lighting conditions.
• TCL 5-Series (R635) (based on RTINGS.com, CNET data):
• Panel Type: VA LCD with full-array local dimming (48–60 zones) and quantum dots.
• Brightness: ~505 cd/m² (SDR real scene), ~756 cd/m² (HDR 10% window), better for bright rooms than the G1.
• Contrast: ~5,243:1 native, enhanced to ~10,000:1 with local dimming, delivering deep blacks with some blooming.
• Color Performance: Covers ~87% of DCI-P3, offering vibrant colors but less accurate than the G1.
• Viewing Angles: Narrow (~25° for color washout), better for solo or small-group viewing.
• HDR Support: Supports HDR10, Dolby Vision, and HLG, matching the G1’s streaming compatibility.
• Upscaling: Decent upscaling (~7.0/10), but less refined than the G1, with minor softness in low-quality content.
• Reflections: Semi-gloss screen with moderate reflection handling (~5.6% total reflections), less effective than the G1.

Verdict on Picture Quality: The LG G1 excels with infinite contrast, perfect blacks, and wide viewing angles, making it ideal for cinematic experiences in dark or controlled lighting. Its superior color accuracy and upscaling enhance movies and streaming. The TCL 5-Series offers higher brightness (~756 cd/m² vs. ~412 cd/m² HDR) and vibrant colors, performing better in brighter rooms, but its narrower viewing angles and blooming limit its cinematic depth.

2. Gaming Performance

• LG OLED evo G1:
• Refresh Rate: 120Hz, supporting 4K/120Hz via four HDMI 2.1 ports.
• Input Lag: ~13ms at 4K@60Hz (~9.6ms with Input Lag Boost), highly responsive.
• Features: VRR, G-SYNC, FreeSync Premium, ALLM, ideal for modern consoles like PS5/Xbox Series X.
• Game Mode: OLED’s near-instantaneous response time (~0.2ms) ensures crisp motion.
• TCL 5-Series (R635):
• Refresh Rate: 60Hz (120Hz with motion interpolation), not supporting 4K/120Hz due to HDMI 2.0.
• Input Lag: ~15.7ms at 4K@60Hz, slightly less responsive than the G1.
• Features: VRR, FreeSync, ALLM, but lacks HDMI 2.1, limiting next-gen console features.
• Game Mode: Good contrast enhances dark scenes, but motion handling is less fluid.

Verdict on Gaming: The LG G1 is superior for gaming with lower input lag (~13ms vs. ~15.7ms), 4K/120Hz support, and advanced features (G-SYNC, HDMI 2.1), making it ideal for serious gamers. The TCL 5-Series is adequate for casual gaming but lacks next-gen capabilities.

3. Sound Quality

• LG OLED evo G1:
• 2.2-channel speakers with 60W output (20W woofer), supporting Dolby Atmos and Dolby Digital via eARC.
• AI Sound Pro optimizes audio, but lacks deep bass without a soundbar.
• Decent for small rooms, but a soundbar is recommended for immersive audio.
• TCL 5-Series (R635):
• 2.0-channel speakers with 16W output, supporting Dolby Atmos via eARC.
• Frequency response extends to ~80 Hz, offering limited bass.
• Soundbar required for cinematic audio due to weaker output.

Verdict on Sound: The LG G1 offers superior audio with higher power (60W vs. 16W) and a woofer, providing a richer soundstage. Both TVs benefit from a soundbar for immersive sound, but the G1 performs better out of the box.

4. Smart Features and Connectivity

• LG OLED evo G1:
• Platform: webOS 6.0, intuitive with Magic Remote, Freeview Play, AirPlay, HomeKit, and apps (Netflix, Disney+).
• Voice Assistants: Google Assistant and Alexa built-in.
• Connectivity: Four HDMI 2.1 ports, three USB 2.0 ports, Ethernet, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, RF input, 3.5mm headphone output.
• AI Features: AI Picture Pro, AI Sound Pro, and ThinQ AI for smart home control.
• TCL 5-Series (R635):
• Platform: Roku TV, user-friendly with extensive app support (Netflix, YouTube) and simple navigation.
• Voice Assistants: Roku Voice, Google Assistant/Alexa via third-party devices.
• Connectivity: Four HDMI 2.0 ports, one USB port, Ethernet, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, 3.5mm headphone output.
• AI Features: Limited to basic upscaling and content search.

Verdict on Smart Features: The LG G1’s webOS with Magic Remote, built-in voice assistants, and AirPlay/HomeKit support is more intuitive and versatile. The TCL 5-Series’ Roku TV offers a simple, app-rich interface but lacks advanced AI features and HDMI 2.1.

5. Design and Build

• LG OLED evo G1:
• Gallery design with ultra-slim 20mm depth, flush wall-mount included (VESA 300×300).
• No stand included; optional feet (~KSh 12,900) or third-party stand needed.
• Glossy screen, premium build (~63.9 lbs for 65-inch), ideal for wall-mounted setups.
• TCL 5-Series (R635):
• Sleek design with thin bezels (~0.4 inches) and a sturdy stand.
• Max thickness ~2.8 inches, lighter at ~38 lbs (65-inch).
• Semi-gloss screen, functional but less premium build.

Verdict on Design: The LG G1’s gallery-style, ultra-slim design is ideal for wall-mounted, art-like aesthetics, appealing to design-conscious buyers. The TCL 5-Series’ practical stand-based design is less elegant but more versatile for tabletop setups.

---

Cost Comparison (in Kenyan Shillings)

Prices are estimated based on 2021 pricing for the G1 and R635, adjusted for 2025 secondary/refurbished markets, and converted using an exchange rate of 1 USD = 130 KSh (as of August 2025). Local pricing in Kenya may vary due to import duties, taxes, and limited availability. Check with retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or authorized LG/TCL dealers for exact prices.

LG OLED evo G1 Prices

Based on OLED65G1PUA pricing (Tom’s Guide, RTINGS.com):

• 55-inch: $1,000–$1,200 (refurbished) ≈ KSh 130,000–156,000
• 65-inch: $1,500–$1,800 (refurbished) ≈ KSh 195,000–234,000
• 77-inch: $2,500–$3,000 (refurbished) ≈ KSh 325,000–390,000

TCL 5-Series (R635) Prices

Based on 55R635/65R635 pricing (RTINGS.com, CNET):

• 55-inch: $500–$600 (refurbished) ≈ KSh 65,000–78,000
• 65-inch: $700–$800 (refurbished) ≈ KSh 91,000–104,000
• 75-inch: $900–$1,000 (refurbished) ≈ KSh 117,000–130,000

Verdict on Cost: The TCL 5-Series is significantly more affordable, starting at ~KSh 65,000, offering excellent value for budget-conscious buyers. The LG G1, starting at ~KSh 130,000, commands a premium for its OLED technology and design, with limited availability in Kenya due to its 2021 release.

---

Target Audience

• LG OLED evo G1:
• Ideal For: Cinephiles, design enthusiasts, and gamers prioritizing premium picture quality and aesthetics. Its perfect blacks and wide viewing angles suit Kenyan homes with controlled lighting or wall-mounted setups.
• Use Case: Best for HDR movies, gaming, and group viewing in dark rooms.
• Budget: Appeals to buyers with KSh 130,000–390,000, willing to seek refurbished units for top-tier quality.
• TCL 5-Series (R635):
• Ideal For: Budget-conscious viewers, casual gamers, and those in brighter rooms. Its vibrant colors and value suit cost-sensitive Kenyan households.
• Use Case: Ideal for streaming, sports, and casual gaming in moderately lit environments.
• Budget: Targets buyers with KSh 65,000–130,000, prioritizing affordability and performance.

---

Final Verdict

Winner: LG OLED evo G1

The LG OLED evo G1 is the superior choice for its unmatched picture quality, with infinite contrast, perfect blacks, and wide viewing angles (~47° vs. ~25°), making it ideal for cinematic experiences, group viewing, and premium gaming in darker settings. Its Dolby Vision support, superior upscaling (~8.5/10 vs. ~7.0/10), and advanced gaming features (4K/120Hz, G-SYNC) elevate its performance, though its higher cost (~KSh 130,000–390,000) and burn-in risk may deter some buyers.

The TCL 5-Series (R635) offers excellent value with higher brightness (~756 cd/m² vs. ~412 cd/m² HDR), vibrant colors, and affordability (~KSh 65,000–130,000), performing well in brighter rooms. Its Dolby Vision support matches the G1, but narrower viewing angles and weaker gaming features (60Hz, no HDMI 2.1) limit its versatility.

Recommendation: Choose the LG OLED evo G1 if you prioritize premium picture quality, gaming, and a gallery-style design for dark-room viewing, with a budget of KSh 130,000–390,000, and can source a refurbished unit. Opt for the TCL 5-Series (R635) if you seek an affordable, vibrant TV for casual use in brighter rooms, with a budget of KSh 65,000–130,000. Verify pricing and availability through Kenyan retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or authorized dealers.

NOMA NTV THURSDAY 14TH JULY 2025 FULL EPISODE

Samsung QLED Q70F vs. LG OLED C8: A Comprehensive Comparison for the Kenyan Market

For Kenyan consumers seeking a premium television in 2025, the Samsung QLED Q70F and LG OLED C8 are two compelling options from 2018 that remain relevant in secondary or refurbished markets. The Samsung Q70F, a QLED TV with quantum dot technology, offers bright visuals and gaming features, while the LG C8, an OLED TV, delivers perfect blacks and wide viewing angles for cinematic experiences. This article compares their quality, costs, and target audience to guide Kenyan buyers, with prices in Kenyan Shillings (KSh) for local relevance.

---

Overview of the TVs

Samsung QLED Q70F

The Samsung QLED Q70F (likely a 2018 model, similar to the Q70R cited in sources) is a mid-range 4K QLED TV with a VA panel, full-array local dimming, and quantum dots. It uses the Quantum Processor 4K and Tizen OS, designed for bright rooms, gaming, and versatile content consumption, with no risk of burn-in.

LG OLED C8

The LG OLED C8, a 2018 flagship OLED, features a WOLED panel with the α9 Intelligent Processor, offering pixel-level dimming for infinite contrast. Running on webOS, it’s optimized for dark-room viewing, movies, and group settings, though it carries a risk of burn-in with prolonged static content.

---

Quality Comparison

1. Picture Quality

• Samsung QLED Q70F (based on Q70R data from RTINGS.com):
• Panel Type: VA LCD with full-array local dimming and quantum dots.
• Brightness: ~449 cd/m² (SDR real scene), ~747 cd/m² (HDR real scene), ideal for bright rooms.
• Contrast: Native contrast ~7,250:1, enhanced to ~8,056:1 with local dimming, delivering deep blacks with minimal blooming.
• Color Performance: Covers ~87.83% of DCI-P3 and ~65.37% of Rec.2020, offering vibrant colors.
• Viewing Angles: Narrow (~28° for color washout), better for solo or small-group viewing.
• HDR Support: Supports HDR10, HDR10+, and HLG, but lacks Dolby Vision.
• Upscaling: Quantum Processor 4K provides solid upscaling, though less refined than OLED for low-resolution content.
• Reflections: Semi-gloss screen with 5.3% total reflections, decent but not ideal in bright rooms.
• LG OLED C8 (based on RTINGS.com data):
• Panel Type: WOLED with self-emissive pixels.
• Brightness: ~318 cd/m² (SDR real scene), ~666 cd/m² (HDR real scene), better for dark rooms.
• Contrast: Infinite contrast due to pixel-level dimming, delivering perfect blacks with no blooming.
• Color Performance: Covers ~96.64% of DCI-P3 and ~70.44% of Rec.2020, with superior color accuracy.
• Viewing Angles: Wide (~48° for color washout), ideal for group viewing.
• HDR Support: Supports HDR10, Dolby Vision, and HLG, enhancing streaming content.
• Upscaling: α9 processor excels at upscaling, rendering SD/HD content cleanly.
• Reflections: Glossy screen with 1.3% total reflections, excellent reflection handling.

Verdict on Picture Quality: The LG C8 outperforms in dark-room settings with perfect blacks, infinite contrast, and wide viewing angles, ideal for cinematic content. The Samsung Q70F excels in bright rooms with higher brightness (~747 cd/m² vs. ~666 cd/m² HDR) and vibrant colors, but its narrower viewing angles limit group viewing.

2. Gaming Performance

• Samsung QLED Q70F:
• Refresh Rate: 120Hz (except 49-inch), supporting 1080p/120Hz and VRR.
• Input Lag: ~15.0ms at 4K@60Hz, responsive for gaming.
• Features: FreeSync, ALLM, and four HDMI 2.0 ports (no HDMI 2.1), ideal for older consoles.
• Game Mode: Maintains bright visuals with low latency.
• LG OLED C8:
• Refresh Rate: 120Hz, supporting 1080p/120Hz but not 4K/120Hz due to HDMI 2.0.
• Input Lag: ~21.1ms at 4K@60Hz, slightly higher but still responsive.
• Features: ALLM, no VRR or FreeSync, four HDMI 2.0 ports.
• Game Mode: OLED’s near-instantaneous response time (~0.2ms) ensures crisp motion.

Verdict on Gaming: The Samsung Q70F is better for gaming with lower input lag (~15.0ms vs. ~21.1ms) and FreeSync/VRR support, ideal for older consoles or PC gaming. The LG C8’s fast response time benefits motion clarity, but it lacks VRR.

3. Sound Quality

• Samsung QLED Q70F:
• 2.1-channel speakers with 40W output, supporting Dolby Atmos via eARC.
• Frequency response with low extension to 71.27 Hz, offering decent bass.
• Q-Symphony (if compatible) enhances audio with Samsung soundbars, but a soundbar is recommended.
• LG OLED C8:
• 2.2-channel speakers with 40W output, including a woofer, supporting Dolby Atmos natively.
• Frequency response extends to 63.50 Hz, slightly better bass than Q70F.
• AI Sound Pro optimizes audio, but lacks weight without a soundbar.

Verdict on Sound: The LG C8 offers slightly better bass and native Dolby Atmos, providing a marginally richer soundstage. Both TVs benefit from a soundbar for immersive audio.

4. Smart Features and Connectivity

• Samsung QLED Q70F:
• Platform: Tizen OS (2018 version), smooth with Smart Hub, Netflix, YouTube, and Samsung TV Plus.
• Voice Assistants: Bixby, Alexa, and Google Assistant via third-party devices.
• Connectivity: Four HDMI 2.0 ports, two USB ports, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Ethernet.
• AI Features: Basic AI upscaling and content recommendations.
• LG OLED C8:
• Platform: webOS 4.0, intuitive with Magic Remote, Netflix, YouTube, and AirPlay/HomeKit support.
• Voice Assistants: Google Assistant and Alexa built-in.
• Connectivity: Four HDMI 2.0 ports, three USB ports, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth.
• AI Features: ThinQ AI enhances picture, sound, and smart home integration.

Verdict on Smart Features: The LG C8’s webOS with Magic Remote is more intuitive, and built-in voice assistants add convenience. The Samsung Q70F’s Tizen is robust but slightly less user-friendly.

5. Design and Build

• Samsung QLED Q70F:
• Matte black finish with thin bezels (~0.4 inches) and a central stand.
• Max thickness ~2.5 inches, heavier due to full-array backlight.
• Semi-gloss screen with moderate reflection handling (5.3% total reflections).
• LG OLED C8:
• Ultra-slim OLED design with thin bezels (~0.35 inches) and a pedestal stand.
• Max thickness ~1.89 inches, sleek and lightweight.
• Glossy screen with excellent reflection handling (1.3% total reflections).

Verdict on Design: The LG C8’s slimmer profile and better reflection handling give it a premium aesthetic, ideal for wall-mounting. The Samsung Q70F’s design is solid but less elegant.

---

Cost Comparison (in Kenyan Shillings)

Prices are estimated based on 2018 pricing for the Q70R and C8, adjusted for 2025 secondary/refurbished markets, and converted using an exchange rate of 1 USD = 130 KSh (as of August 2025). Local pricing in Kenya may vary due to import duties, taxes, and limited availability. Check with retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or Samsung/LG authorized dealers for exact prices.

Samsung QLED Q70F Prices

Based on Q70R pricing (RTINGS.com, B&H Photo):

• 55-inch: $800–$1,000 (refurbished) ≈ KSh 104,000–130,000
• 65-inch: $1,000–$1,200 (refurbished) ≈ KSh 130,000–156,000
• 75-inch: $1,400–$1,600 (refurbished) ≈ KSh 182,000–208,000
• 85-inch: $1,800–$2,000 (refurbished) ≈ KSh 234,000–260,000

LG OLED C8 Prices

Based on C8 pricing (RTINGS.com, Consumer Reports):

• 55-inch: $1,200–$1,500 (refurbished) ≈ KSh 156,000–195,000
• 65-inch: $1,800–$2,200 (refurbished) ≈ KSh 234,000–286,000
• 77-inch: $3,000–$3,500 (refurbished) ≈ KSh 390,000–455,000

Verdict on Cost: The Samsung Q70F is more affordable, starting at ~KSh 104,000, and likely easier to source in Kenya’s secondary market. The LG C8, starting at ~KSh 156,000, commands a premium for its OLED quality and may be harder to find.

---

Target Audience

• Samsung QLED Q70F:
• Ideal For: Casual viewers, gamers, and those in bright living rooms. Its high brightness suits Kenyan homes with open, sunlit spaces.
• Use Case: Best for sports, gaming, and mixed content in well-lit environments.
• Budget: Appeals to buyers with KSh 104,000–260,000, seeking value and reliability.
• LG OLED C8:
• Ideal For: Cinephiles, families, and viewers in dark or controlled lighting environments. Its perfect blacks and wide viewing angles are perfect for movie nights or group viewing.
• Use Case: Ideal for HDR movies, dark-room viewing, and cinematic experiences.
• Budget: Targets buyers with KSh 156,000–455,000, willing to seek refurbished units for premium quality.

---

Final Verdict

Winner: LG OLED C8

The LG OLED C8 is the superior choice for its exceptional picture quality, with infinite contrast, perfect blacks, and wide viewing angles (~48° vs. ~28°), making it ideal for cinematic experiences and group viewing in darker settings. Its Dolby Vision support, superior upscaling, and intuitive webOS enhance streaming and movie content, though its higher cost (~KSh 156,000–455,000) and burn-in risk are drawbacks.

The Samsung QLED Q70F excels in bright rooms with higher brightness (~747 cd/m² vs. ~666 cd/m² HDR) and vibrant colors, making it versatile for sports, gaming, and casual viewing. Its lower input lag (~15.0ms vs. ~21.1ms), FreeSync/VRR, and affordability (~KSh 104,000–260,000) make it appealing, but narrower viewing angles and lack of Dolby Vision limit its versatility.

Recommendation: Choose the LG OLED C8 if you prioritize premium picture quality for movies and group viewing in controlled lighting, with a budget of KSh 156,000–455,000, and can source a refurbished unit. Opt for the Samsung QLED Q70F if you need a brighter, more affordable TV (KSh 104,000–260,000) for well-lit rooms and gaming. Verify pricing and availability through Kenyan retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or authorized dealers.

NOMA NTV WEDNESDAY 13TH JULY 2025 FULL EPISODE

Samsung QLED Q80F vs. LG OLED evo B7: A Comparison for Kenyan Buyers

For Kenyan consumers seeking a premium 4K television in 2025, the Samsung QLED Q80F (2018) and the LG OLED evo B7 (2017) represent two distinct approaches to display technology, though both are older models likely available refurbished or second-hand. The Q80F, a high-end QLED from Samsung’s 2018 lineup, uses quantum dot technology with full-array local dimming (FALD) for vibrant colors and strong brightness. The B7, LG’s entry-level OLED from 2017, delivers perfect blacks and infinite contrast with its self-emissive OLED panel. This article compares their picture quality, performance, and costs in Kenyan shillings, tailored to Kenyan viewing habits and market realities as of August 11, 2025, to determine the winner and ideal audience.

---

Understanding the Technologies: QLED vs. OLED

• Samsung QLED Q80F (LCD-based QLED): The Q80F combines quantum dot technology with a VA panel and FALD for enhanced contrast and color at 4K resolution (3840×2160). Powered by the Q Engine, it supports HDR10+ and Tizen OS but lacks modern gaming features like HDMI 2.1 due to its 2018 release. It’s designed for bright rooms and durability.
• LG OLED evo B7 (OLED): The B7 uses a WOLED panel where each pixel is self-emissive, producing perfect blacks and infinite contrast. Powered by LG’s α7 processor, it supports Dolby Vision and webOS but lacks the brightness and gaming advancements of newer OLEDs like the C6 or G6. It’s suited for cinematic viewing in controlled lighting.

These technologies—QLED’s brightness and burn-in immunity versus OLED’s contrast and viewing angles—cater to different Kenyan home environments, from sunlit urban living rooms to darker, communal setups.

---

Picture Quality Comparison

Contrast and Black Levels

• LG OLED evo B7: The OLED panel delivers perfect black levels and an infinite contrast ratio, as each pixel turns off completely, eliminating light bleed. This produces stunning depth in dark scenes, ideal for watching films like Rafiki or The Lion King in dimly lit Kenyan homes.
• Samsung QLED Q80F: The VA panel with FALD offers a high contrast ratio (~5,626:1 with dimming, ~1,486:1 native), with deep blacks and minimal blooming (~48 dimming zones). It cannot match OLED’s true blacks, showing slight light bleed in high-contrast scenes.

Winner: LG B7 for its perfect blacks and infinite contrast, ideal for dark-room cinematic viewing.

Brightness

• Samsung QLED Q80F: Achieves higher brightness (~677 cd/m² in SDR real scenes, ~839 cd/m² in HDR 10% window), making it excellent for bright Kenyan living rooms with large windows, common in Nairobi or Mombasa. Its semi-gloss finish handles reflections adequately (~5.3% total reflections).
• LG OLED evo B7: Reaches ~540 cd/m² in HDR and ~200–300 cd/m² in SDR, significantly lower than modern OLEDs, limiting its performance in bright settings. Its glossy finish offers good reflection handling (~2% total reflections) but struggles in sunny conditions.

Winner: Samsung Q80F for its brighter display, ideal for Kenya’s sunny environments.

Color Performance

• LG OLED evo B7: Covers ~97% DCI-P3 with excellent color accuracy (color dE ~1.5 pre-calibration) and supports Dolby Vision, enhancing HDR content like Maisha Magic shows with vibrant, lifelike colors.
• Samsung QLED Q80F: Covers ~89.65% DCI-P3 with HDR10+, offering vibrant colors (color dE ~2.40 pre-calibration) but less accurate than OLED. Quantum dots ensure good color volume for Kenyan content like local dramas.

Winner: LG B7 for its superior color accuracy and Dolby Vision support, ideal for HDR enthusiasts.

Viewing Angles

• LG OLED evo B7: Offers wide viewing angles (color washout at ~65°, black level raise at ~70°), maintaining consistent color and contrast, perfect for Kenyan family gatherings watching football or Zora from various angles.
• Samsung QLED Q80F: The VA panel has narrower viewing angles (color washout at ~33°, black level raise at ~70°), with degradation off-axis, better suited for straight-on viewing in smaller setups.

Winner: LG B7 for its wide viewing angles, ideal for group viewing.

Motion Handling and Gaming

• LG OLED evo B7: Features a near-instantaneous response time (~0.2ms), eliminating motion blur for sports like the Safari Sevens. It supports 4K/60Hz and ALLM via HDMI 2.0 with input lag ~34ms, suitable for casual gaming but not next-gen consoles due to its age.
• Samsung QLED Q80F: Has a slower response time (~3.8ms at 80%) and a 120Hz refresh rate, with slight blur in fast scenes. It supports VRR, ALLM, and FreeSync via HDMI 2.0 with input lag ~10ms, better for casual gaming but still limited compared to modern TVs.

Winner: Samsung Q80F for its better gaming features, suitable for casual Kenyan gamers.

Burn-In Risk

• LG OLED evo B7: OLEDs risk burn-in with prolonged static content (e.g., Citizen TV news tickers, Safaricom app interfaces). Early OLEDs like the B7 have limited burn-in mitigation, a concern for heavy static content users in Kenya.
• Samsung QLED Q80F: LCD-based, it’s immune to burn-in, making it safer for static content common in Kenyan homes.

Winner: Samsung Q80F for its burn-in immunity, appealing to static content users.

---

Cost Comparison (Kenyan Market)

Pricing in Kenya varies by retailer (e.g., Jumia, Kilimall, Hotpoint, LG Brand Shops), import duties, and promotions like Black Friday. Both models are older, so they’re primarily available refurbished or second-hand. Based on 2025 market trends for a 55-inch model, as of August 11, 2025:

• Samsung QLED Q80F (55”): Retails around KES 60,000–80,000 (approx. $460–$615 USD) for refurbished units on platforms like Jumia or local second-hand markets. Its age lowers the price, but availability may be limited.
• LG OLED evo B7 (55”): Priced around KES 70,000–90,000 (approx. $540–$695 USD) for refurbished units, slightly higher due to OLED’s premium appeal despite its 2017 release. Availability is also limited.

Winner: Samsung Q80F for its lower cost, offering better value for budget-conscious Kenyan buyers.

---

Additional Considerations

Smart Features and Software

• LG OLED evo B7: Runs on an older webOS 3.5, supporting Netflix and YouTube but with limited updates for modern apps like Showmax in 2025. It supports early HomeKit and voice control (Google Assistant, Alexa), but its outdated platform may frustrate tech-savvy Kenyan users.
• Samsung QLED Q80F: Uses Tizen OS (2018), supporting Netflix, YouTube, and basic voice control (Bixby) but also lacking updates for modern apps. It lacks HomeKit, limiting smart home integration.

Winner: LG B7 for its slightly more versatile webOS, though both are dated.

Sound Quality

• LG OLED evo B7: Features Dolby Atmos and 2.2-channel speakers (40W) with Harman/Kardon tuning, delivering immersive audio for Kenyan viewers watching local music shows or films. A soundbar is recommended for larger rooms.
• Samsung QLED Q80F: Includes 2.1-channel speakers (40W) with basic audio processing, offering clear but less dynamic sound. A soundbar is also advised.

Winner: LG B7 for its Dolby Atmos support and richer audio.

Durability and Longevity

• LG OLED evo B7: OLED panels may degrade over time, reducing brightness (~30,000 hours lifespan), with higher burn-in risk in early models, a concern for heavy use in Kenyan homes.
• Samsung QLED Q80F: LCD panels are more durable (~40,000–100,000 hours), with no burn-in risk and better brightness retention, ideal for frequent use.

Winner: Samsung Q80F for its durability and burn-in immunity.

---

Final Verdict: Which TV Wins for Kenyan Buyers?

The LG OLED evo B7 is the superior choice for picture quality, offering perfect blacks, infinite contrast, wide viewing angles, and Dolby Vision support. It’s ideal for movie enthusiasts and group viewing in darker Kenyan homes, such as urban apartments in Nairobi or Kisumu, for cinematic content like Maisha Magic or football matches. Its Dolby Atmos audio enhances the experience, but its higher price (KES 70,000–90,000), burn-in risk, and outdated webOS limit its practicality.

The Samsung QLED Q80F excels in bright rooms with its higher brightness (~677 cd/m² SDR), burn-in immunity, and lower cost (KES 60,000–80,000). It’s ideal for budget-conscious Kenyan families in sunlit living rooms, common in Mombasa or Eldoret, and for static content needs (e.g., Citizen TV, Safaricom apps), with decent gaming features for casual use.

Target Audience in Kenya

• LG OLED evo B7: Ideal for affluent movie enthusiasts and families in urban areas who prioritize cinematic visuals and group viewing in darker or controlled lighting. It suits buyers seeking refurbished OLEDs for premium picture quality, despite burn-in risks.
• Samsung QLED Q80F: Best for budget-conscious households, casual viewers, and those with bright living rooms or static content needs across Kenya’s urban and rural areas. It’s perfect for straight-on viewing of local channels or streaming, especially for buyers sourcing affordable refurbished units.

The Winner

The Samsung QLED Q80F takes the crown for its superior value, brightness, durability, and burn-in immunity, making it the better choice for most Kenyan buyers in 2025 seeking an affordable, refurbished TV for bright environments. The LG OLED evo B7 offers unmatched picture quality for cinematic viewing, but its higher cost, burn-in risk, and limited availability make it less practical. Choose based on your budget, room lighting, and viewing priorities in your Kenyan home.

NOMA NTV TUESDAY 12TH JULY 2025 FULL EPISODE

Samsung QLED Q60E vs. LG NanoCell NANO95: A Comparison for Kenyan Buyers

For Kenyan consumers seeking a mid-range 4K television in 2025, the Samsung QLED Q60E (2025) and the LG NanoCell NANO95 (2021–2022) present compelling options with distinct strengths. The Q60E, an entry-level QLED TV, leverages quantum dot technology for vibrant colors and solid brightness, while the NANO95, a premium NanoCell model, emphasizes color purity and wide viewing angles with its 8K resolution. This article compares their picture quality, performance, and costs in Kenyan shillings, tailored to Kenyan viewing habits and market realities as of August 10, 2025, to determine the winner and ideal audience.

---

Understanding the Technologies: QLED vs. NanoCell

• Samsung QLED Q60E (LCD-based QLED): The Q60E uses quantum dot technology with an edge-lit LED backlight and a VA panel to deliver enhanced color vibrancy and contrast at 4K resolution (3840×2160). Powered by the Quantum Processor Lite 4K, it offers decent upscaling, gaming features, and Tizen OS, making it a budget-friendly QLED option for bright rooms and mixed usage.
• LG NanoCell NANO95 (LCD-based NanoCell): The NANO95 employs a nanoparticle filter to enhance color purity, paired with an IPS panel and full-array local dimming (FALD) for improved contrast at 8K resolution (7680×4320). Powered by LG’s α9 Gen 4 AI Processor, it supports Dolby Vision and advanced gaming features, positioning it as a premium NanoCell model for versatile viewing.

These technologies—QLED’s brightness and contrast versus NanoCell’s viewing angles and 8K resolution—cater to different Kenyan needs, from sunlit urban living rooms to communal setups for family viewing.

---

Picture Quality Comparison

Contrast and Black Levels

• LG NanoCell NANO95: The IPS panel has a lower native contrast ratio (~1,200:1), producing grayish blacks that are less ideal for dark-room viewing. FALD improves contrast to ~1,676:1, but light bleed persists in high-contrast scenes like Nairobi Half Life during evening viewing in Kenyan homes.
• Samsung QLED Q60E: The VA panel delivers a higher contrast ratio (~6,150:1, based on Q60B), with deeper blacks and excellent black uniformity (0.489% std. dev.). Without local dimming, it outperforms the NANO95 in dark scenes, ideal for dimly lit Kenyan living rooms.

Winner: Samsung Q60E for its superior contrast and black levels, perfect for darker viewing environments.

Brightness

• Samsung QLED Q60E: Achieves higher SDR brightness (~450 cd/m² in real scenes, ~480 cd/m² in HDR, based on Q60B), making it better for bright Kenyan living rooms with large windows, common in Nairobi or Mombasa. Its semi-gloss finish handles reflections adequately (5.1% total reflections).
• LG NanoCell NANO95: Reaches ~600–700 cd/m² in HDR (10% window) but ~223 cd/m² in SDR real scenes, less effective in bright settings. Its anti-reflective coating (3.4% total reflections) performs slightly better, but its SDR brightness limits its impact in sunny rooms.

Winner: Samsung Q60E for its brighter SDR display, ideal for Kenya’s sunny environments.

Color Performance

• LG NanoCell NANO95: Covers ~90% DCI-P3 with Dolby Vision support, offering accurate colors (color dE 2.01 pre-calibration) for HDR content like Maisha Magic shows. Its NanoCell technology and 8K resolution enhance color detail, though it’s less vibrant in SDR.
• Samsung QLED Q60E: Covers ~88.56% DCI-P3 with HDR10+, delivering vibrant colors (color dE 1.36 pre-calibration) but lacking Dolby Vision. Its quantum dots provide good vibrancy for Kenyan content like local dramas, though slightly less refined for HDR.

Winner: LG NANO95 for its Dolby Vision support and 8K-enhanced color detail, ideal for HDR enthusiasts.

Viewing Angles

• LG NanoCell NANO95: The IPS panel offers wide viewing angles (color washout at ~27°, black level raise at ~70°), maintaining color and contrast consistency, perfect for Kenyan family gatherings watching football or Zora from various angles.
• Samsung QLED Q60E: The VA panel has narrower viewing angles (color washout at ~26°, black level raise at ~19°), with degradation off-axis, better suited for straight-on viewing in smaller Kenyan setups.

Winner: LG NANO95 for its wide viewing angles, ideal for group viewing.

Motion Handling and Gaming

• LG NanoCell NANO95: Features a faster response time (6.9ms at 80%) and a 120Hz refresh rate, reducing motion blur for sports like the Kenyan Premier League. It supports HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, FreeSync, and G-Sync on two ports, with input lag ~9.8ms, ideal for Kenyan gamers on PS5 or Xbox Series X.
• Samsung QLED Q60E: Has a slower response time (~10ms, based on Q60B) and a 60Hz refresh rate, with slight blur in fast scenes. It supports ALLM but lacks HDMI 2.1 or VRR, with input lag ~10ms, suitable for casual gaming but not next-gen consoles.

Winner: LG NANO95 for its superior motion handling and gaming features, ideal for Kenyan gamers.

Burn-In Risk

• LG NanoCell NANO95: LCD-based, it’s immune to burn-in, safe for static content like Citizen TV news tickers or Safaricom app interfaces common in Kenyan homes.
• Samsung QLED Q60E: Also LCD-based, it’s immune to burn-in, offering reliability for similar static content.

Winner: Tie. Both TVs are burn-in-free, suitable for varied Kenyan usage.

---

Cost Comparison (Kenyan Market)

Pricing in Kenya varies by retailer (e.g., Jumia, Kilimall, Hotpoint, LG Brand Shops), import duties, and promotions like Black Friday. Based on 2025 trends for a 55-inch model, as of August 10, 2025:

• Samsung QLED Q60E (55”): Retails around KES 95,000–120,000 (approx. $730–$925 USD), reflecting its 2025 release and entry-level QLED status. Sales may lower it to ~KES 85,000, offering excellent value for Kenyan buyers.
• LG NanoCell NANO95 (55”): Priced around KES 140,000–180,000 (approx. $1,080–$1,390 USD), reflecting its premium 8K NanoCell features and older model year (2021–2022). Discounts may reduce it to ~KES 130,000, but limited availability may increase costs due to import factors.

Winner: Samsung Q60E for its lower cost and better value, ideal for Kenya’s price-sensitive market.

---

Additional Considerations

Smart Features and Software

• LG NanoCell NANO95: Runs on webOS 22, a user-friendly platform with apps like Netflix, Showmax, and YouTube, popular in Kenya for streaming local content like Selina. It supports AirPlay 2, HomeKit, and voice control (Google Assistant, Alexa), appealing to urban Kenyan smart homes. The Magic Remote enhances navigation.
• Samsung QLED Q60E: Uses Tizen OS 2025, offering Samsung TV Plus, a Gaming Hub, and voice control (Bixby, Alexa, Google Assistant). It lacks HomeKit, limiting smart home integration, but its interface is intuitive for casual Kenyan viewers.

Winner: LG NANO95 for its HomeKit support and intuitive webOS, ideal for Kenya’s tech-savvy market.

Sound Quality

• LG NanoCell NANO95: Features Dolby Atmos and 2.2-channel speakers (40W), delivering immersive audio for Kenyan viewers watching local music shows or films. A soundbar is recommended for larger rooms.
• Samsung QLED Q60E: Includes Object Tracking Sound Lite and 2.0-channel speakers (20W), offering clear but less dynamic audio. A soundbar is also advised for enhanced sound in Kenyan homes.

Winner: LG NANO95 for its Atmos support and more powerful audio.

Durability and Longevity

• LG NanoCell NANO95: IPS panels are durable with no burn-in risk, but lower contrast may degrade slightly over time with heavy use in Kenyan households (lifespan ~40,000–100,000 hours).
• Samsung QLED Q60E: VA panels offer better contrast retention and no burn-in risk, ensuring longevity for frequent use in Kenyan homes (~40,000–100,000 hours).

Winner: Samsung Q60E for its contrast longevity and durability.

---

Final Verdict: Which TV Wins for Kenyan Buyers?

The Samsung QLED Q60E is the superior choice for value and performance in bright rooms, offering higher contrast (~6,150:1), better SDR brightness (~450 cd/m²), and affordability (KES 95,000–120,000). It’s ideal for budget-conscious Kenyan families in bright living rooms, such as those in Nairobi or Mombasa, and for static content needs like Citizen TV or Safaricom apps, thanks to its burn-in immunity and VA panel. Its 4K resolution suits most streaming and broadcast content in Kenya.

The LG NanoCell NANO95 excels in group viewing with its wide viewing angles (~27° color washout) and premium features, including Dolby Vision, 8K resolution, and advanced gaming capabilities (120Hz, HDMI 2.1). Its higher price (KES 140,000–180,000) and 8K capabilities appeal to tech-savvy urban Kenyans in moderately lit rooms who prioritize HDR content and gaming, though 8K content remains scarce in Kenya.

Target Audience in Kenya

• Samsung QLED Q60E: Ideal for budget-conscious households, casual viewers, and those with bright living rooms or static content needs across Kenya’s urban and rural areas, such as Eldoret or Nakuru. It suits smaller setups for straight-on viewing of local channels, streaming, or casual gaming.
• LG NanoCell NANO95: Best for affluent families, HDR enthusiasts, and gamers in urban areas like Nairobi or Kisumu who value wide viewing angles, 8K resolution, and advanced gaming features for group viewing of football, Tinsel, or next-gen console gaming in moderately lit rooms.

The Winner

The Samsung QLED Q60E takes the crown for its superior value, brightness, contrast, and durability, making it the better choice for most Kenyan buyers in 2025 seeking an affordable, high-performing TV for bright environments. The LG NanoCell NANO95 is a strong alternative for group viewing, HDR performance, and gaming, but its higher cost and limited 8K content availability in Kenya reduce its practicality. Choose based on your budget, room lighting, and viewing habits in your Kenyan home.

NOMA NTV MONDAY 11TH JULY 2025 FULL EPISODE