LG NanoCell 85 Series vs. Sony Bravia XR A80L: A Comprehensive Comparison for the Kenyan Market

For Kenyan consumers seeking a high-quality television in 2025, the LG NanoCell 85 Series (2020 model, e.g., 55NANO85UNA) and Sony Bravia XR A80L (2023 model, e.g., XR-55A80L), both available in secondary or refurbished markets, represent contrasting options in the mid-to-premium range. The LG NanoCell 85 Series, an LED TV with NanoCell technology, offers vibrant colors and gaming features at a budget-friendly price. The Sony A80L, an OLED TV, delivers perfect blacks and cinematic visuals for a premium experience. This article compares their quality, costs, and target audience, with prices in Kenyan Shillings (KSh) tailored for the Kenyan market, using data from RTINGS.com and other sources.

---

Overview of the TVs

LG NanoCell 85 Series

The LG NanoCell 85 Series (2020) is a 4K LED TV with an IPS panel, edge-lit local dimming (~12 zones), and NanoCell technology for enhanced color purity. Powered by the α7 Gen 3 AI Processor and webOS, it’s designed for bright rooms, gaming, and group viewing, available in 49-, 55-, 65-, and 75-inch sizes.

Sony Bravia XR A80L

The Sony Bravia XR A80L (2023) is a 4K OLED TV with a WOLED panel, featuring self-lit pixels and the Cognitive Processor XR. Running on Google TV, it’s optimized for cinematic viewing and gaming, with Acoustic Surface Audio+, available in 55-, 65-, 77-, and 83-inch sizes.

---

Quality Comparison

1. Picture Quality

• LG NanoCell 85 Series (based on RTINGS.com):
• Panel Type: IPS LCD, edge-lit local dimming (~12 zones).
• Brightness: ~305 cd/m² (HDR 10% window), ~267 cd/m² (SDR real scene), adequate for moderately lit rooms.
• Contrast: ~1,558:1 native, ~1,697:1 with dimming, grayish blacks due to IPS, with some blooming.
• Color Performance: ~84.67% DCI-P3, ~62.56% Rec.2020, vibrant colors with NanoCell.
• Viewing Angles: Wide (~30° for color washout), ideal for group viewing.
• HDR Support: HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG, supporting streaming content.
• Upscaling: α7 Gen 3 AI Processor, decent (~6.5/10), struggles with low-quality content.
• Reflections: Good handling (~3.3% total reflections), suitable for bright rooms.
• Sony Bravia XR A80L (based on RTINGS.com):
• Panel Type: WOLED, self-lit pixels, no backlight.
• Brightness: ~654 cd/m² (HDR 10% window), ~349 cd/m² (SDR real scene), better for controlled lighting.
• Contrast: Infinite, perfect blacks with no blooming.
• Color Performance: ~98.81% DCI-P3, ~72.83% Rec.2020, more vibrant and accurate (post-calibration dE ~0.79).
• Viewing Angles: Wide (~64°), excellent for group viewing.
• HDR Support: HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG, matching LG’s streaming compatibility.
• Upscaling: Cognitive Processor XR, excellent (~9.0/10), superior for low-quality content.
• Reflections: Good handling (~1.8% total reflections), glossy finish, effective in varied lighting.

Verdict on Picture Quality: The Sony A80L significantly outperforms with infinite contrast, perfect blacks, and vibrant colors (~98.81% vs. ~84.67% DCI-P3), ideal for cinematic viewing in controlled lighting. Its superior upscaling (~9.0/10 vs. ~6.5/10) enhances low-quality content, and its brighter HDR performance (~654 cd/m² vs. ~305 cd/m²) makes highlights pop. The LG NanoCell 85’s wide viewing angles (~30°) and decent brightness suit bright rooms, but its low contrast and blooming limit dark-room performance.

2. Gaming Performance

• LG NanoCell 85 Series:
• Refresh Rate: 120Hz, 4K/120Hz via two HDMI 2.1 ports.
• Input Lag: ~15.0ms (4K@60Hz), ~5.2ms (4K@120Hz), responsive.
• Features: VRR (buggy), FreeSync, G-SYNC Compatible, ALLM.
• Game Mode: Wide angles enhance multiplayer gaming.
• Sony Bravia XR A80L:
• Refresh Rate: 120Hz, 4K/120Hz via two HDMI 2.1 ports.
• Input Lag: ~16.7ms (4K@60Hz), ~8.8ms (4K@120Hz), slightly less responsive.
• Features: VRR, ALLM, PS5 optimizations (Auto HDR Tone Mapping), no FreeSync.
• Game Mode: Smooth motion, ideal for single-player games.

Verdict on Gaming: The LG NanoCell 85 has a slight edge with lower input lag (~15.0ms vs. ~16.7ms) and broader VRR support (FreeSync, G-SYNC), making it more versatile for PC and console gaming. The Sony A80L’s PS5 optimizations are a plus, but its higher input lag and fewer gaming features make it less ideal for competitive gaming.

3. Sound Quality

• LG NanoCell 85 Series: 2.0-channel speakers, 20W output, Dolby Atmos via eARC, adequate (~6.5/10 score).
• Sony Bravia XR A80L: Acoustic Surface Audio+, 50W output (20W + 20W + 10W + 10W), Dolby Atmos via eARC, excellent (~8.0/10 score).

Verdict on Sound: The Sony A80L’s Acoustic Surface Audio+ (50W vs. 20W) delivers immersive sound with the screen acting as a speaker, offering precise audio placement. The LG NanoCell 85’s audio is basic, requiring a soundbar for comparable performance.

4. Smart Features and Connectivity

• LG NanoCell 85 Series: webOS, Magic Remote, AirPlay, HomeKit, Google Assistant/Alexa, four HDMI (two 2.1), three USB, Bluetooth 5.0, Wi-Fi 5.
• Sony Bravia XR A80L: Google TV, Chromecast, Google Assistant/Alexa, four HDMI (two 2.1), two USB, Bluetooth 4.2, Wi-Fi 5.

Verdict on Smart Features: The LG NanoCell 85’s webOS is intuitive with AirPlay/HomeKit and an extra USB port, ideal for smart home integration. The Sony A80L’s Google TV offers broader app access and Bravia Core for high-bitrate streaming, but its interface can feel less cohesive. Both have two HDMI 2.1 ports, suitable for gaming.

5. Design and Build

• LG NanoCell 85 Series: Slim (~2.17 inches, 55-inch), 0.35-inch bezels, VESA 300×300, ~16.3 kg (55-inch), good reflection handling (~3.3%).
• Sony Bravia XR A80L: Thicker (~2.05 inches, 55-inch), 0.31-inch bezels, VESA 300×300, ~18.4 kg (55-inch), good reflection handling (~1.8%).

Verdict on Design: The LG NanoCell 85 is slimmer, aiding wall-mounting in Kenyan homes, but the Sony A80L’s smaller bezels and glossy finish give it a premium look. The Sony’s superior reflection handling (~1.8% vs. ~3.3%) is better for bright rooms, though both perform well.

---

Cost Comparison (in Kenyan Shillings)

Prices are estimated based on 2020/2023 pricing, adjusted for 2025 secondary/refurbished markets, using an exchange rate of 1 USD = 130 KSh (as of August 17, 2025, 10:04 AM EAT). Local pricing may vary due to import duties and availability. Check with retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or authorized dealers.

LG NanoCell 85 Series Prices (based on RTINGS.com)

• 55-inch: $500–$600 ≈ KSh 65,000–78,000
• 65-inch: $700–$800 ≈ KSh 91,000–104,000
• 75-inch: $900–$1,000 ≈ KSh 117,000–130,000

Sony Bravia XR A80L Prices (based on RTINGS.com, WhatHiFi.com)

• 55-inch: $1,200–$1,400 ≈ KSh 156,000–182,000
• 65-inch: $1,600–$1,800 ≈ KSh 208,000–234,000
• 77-inch: $2,200–$2,500 ≈ KSh 286,000–325,000
• 83-inch: $3,000–$3,500 ≈ KSh 390,000–455,000

Verdict on Cost: The LG NanoCell 85 is significantly more affordable (~KSh 65,000–130,000 vs. ~KSh 156,000–455,000), offering excellent value for budget-conscious buyers. The Sony A80L’s premium pricing reflects its OLED technology and advanced processing.

---

Target Audience

• LG NanoCell 85 Series:
• Ideal For: Families, gamers, and budget-conscious viewers in bright rooms. Its wide viewing angles and gaming features suit Kenyan homes with group setups and casual gaming.
• Use Case: Best for sports, gaming, and streaming in moderately lit environments.
• Budget: KSh 65,000–130,000, for cost-sensitive buyers seeking versatility.
• Sony Bravia XR A80L:
• Ideal For: Cinephiles and premium gamers in controlled lighting. Its perfect blacks and immersive audio suit dedicated home theaters and PS5 users.
• Use Case: Ideal for movies, HDR content, and single-player gaming in darker rooms.
• Budget: KSh 156,000–455,000, for buyers prioritizing cinematic quality.

---

Final Verdict

Winner: Sony Bravia XR A80L

The Sony Bravia XR A80L is the superior choice for its infinite contrast, perfect blacks, and vibrant colors (~98.81% vs. ~84.67% DCI-P3), delivering a cinematic experience unmatched by LED TVs. Its superior upscaling (~9.0/10 vs. ~6.5/10), immersive Acoustic Surface Audio+ (50W vs. 20W), and wide viewing angles (~64°) make it ideal for movies and HDR content in controlled lighting. Despite its higher cost (~KSh 156,000–455,000), it’s a premium investment for Kenyan cinephiles and PS5 gamers.

The LG NanoCell 85 Series offers vibrant colors, wide viewing angles (~30°), and solid gaming performance (lower input lag ~15.0ms vs. ~16.7ms) at a fraction of the cost (~KSh 65,000–130,000). Its edge-lit dimming and lower contrast limit its dark-room performance, but it’s a strong value option for bright rooms and casual use.

Recommendation: Choose the Sony Bravia XR A80L for cinematic viewing and premium gaming in controlled lighting, with a budget of KSh 156,000–455,000. Opt for the LG NanoCell 85 Series for affordable, versatile performance in bright rooms, with a budget of KSh 65,000–130,000. Verify pricing and availability through Kenyan retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or authorized dealers as of August 17, 2025.

AURORA’S QUEST TUESDAY 19TH AUGUST 2025 FULL EPISODE PART 1 AND PART 2 COMBINED

I’ve previously provided a detailed comparison of the LG QNED80 (2023 model) and TCL Mini-LED 5-Series (2020 model), covering their quality, costs, and target audience with prices in Kenyan Shillings (KSh) tailored for the Kenyan market. To avoid redundancy, I’ll provide a concise, updated article based on the same data, ensuring alignment with your request and incorporating the current date and time (07:37 PM EAT, Friday, August 15, 2025). If you need specific additions or modifications, please let me know!

---

LG QNED80 vs. TCL Mini-LED 5-Series: A Comprehensive Comparison for the Kenyan Market

For Kenyan consumers seeking a high-quality television in 2025, the LG QNED80 (2023 model, e.g., 65QNED80URA) and TCL Mini-LED 5-Series (2020 model, e.g., 65S535), available in secondary or refurbished markets, offer compelling mid-range options. The LG QNED80 combines quantum dot and NanoCell technology for vibrant colors and wide viewing angles, ideal for group viewing. The TCL 5-Series, with Mini-LED backlighting, delivers strong contrast and brightness at a lower cost. This article compares their quality, costs, and target audience, with prices in Kenyan Shillings (KSh) for the Kenyan market, using data from RTINGS.com and Versus.com.

---

Quality Comparison

1. Picture Quality

• LG QNED80 (based on RTINGS.com):
• Panel Type: IPS LCD with edge-lit local dimming (~6 zones).
• Brightness: ~485 cd/m² (HDR 10% window), adequate for moderate lighting.
• Contrast: ~1,291:1 native, low, with grayish blacks and blooming.
• Color Performance: ~89.47% DCI-P3, accurate with NanoCell.
• Viewing Angles: Wide (~38°), ideal for group viewing.
• HDR Support: HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG.
• Upscaling: α5 Gen 6 AI Processor, moderate (~6.5/10).
• Reflections: Decent handling (~5.3% total reflections).
• TCL 5-Series (based on RTINGS.com, Versus.com):
• Panel Type: VA LCD with Mini-LED, full-array local dimming (~60 zones).
• Brightness: ~700 cd/m² (HDR, estimated), better for bright rooms.
• Contrast: ~5,000:1 native, deeper blacks with minimal blooming.
• Color Performance: ~90% DCI-P3, vibrant colors.
• Viewing Angles: Narrow (~28°), suited for direct viewing.
• HDR Support: HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG.
• Upscaling: Decent (~7.0/10), slightly better than LG.
• Reflections: Good handling (~4.0% total reflections, estimated).

Verdict: The TCL 5-Series excels with higher brightness (~700 cd/m² vs. ~485 cd/m²) and contrast (~5,000:1 vs. ~1,291:1), ideal for cinematic viewing in bright rooms. The LG QNED80’s wide viewing angles (~38° vs. ~28°) suit group viewing, but its low contrast limits dark-room performance.

2. Gaming Performance

• LG QNED80: 120Hz, 4K/120Hz via two HDMI 2.1 ports, ~13.9ms input lag (4K@60Hz), VRR, FreeSync, ALLM.
• TCL 5-Series: 60Hz, no 4K/120Hz (HDMI 2.0), ~15ms input lag, ALLM, no VRR/FreeSync.

Verdict: The LG QNED80 is superior for gaming with 120Hz, HDMI 2.1, and lower input lag (~13.9ms vs. ~15ms), ideal for modern consoles. The TCL 5-Series is limited for next-gen gaming.

3. Sound Quality

• LG QNED80: 20W 2.0-channel, Dolby Atmos via eARC, adequate (~7.0/10).
• TCL 5-Series: 24W 2.0-channel, Dolby Digital Plus, slightly better (~7.2/10).

Verdict: The TCL 5-Series offers marginally better audio (24W vs. 20W). Both require soundbars for immersive sound.

4. Smart Features and Connectivity

• LG QNED80: webOS, Magic Remote, AirPlay, HomeKit, four HDMI (two 2.1), two USB, Bluetooth 5.0.
• TCL 5-Series: Roku TV, Chromecast, four HDMI 2.0, one USB, Wi-Fi 5.

Verdict: The LG QNED80’s webOS is intuitive with HDMI 2.1 for gaming. The TCL 5-Series’ Roku TV offers broad app access but lacks HDMI 2.1.

5. Design and Build

• LG QNED80: Slim (~1.19 inches), 0.50-inch bezels, VESA 300×300, ~18.4 kg (55-inch), decent reflections (~5.3%).
• TCL 5-Series: Thicker (~3.7 inches), 0.39-inch bezels, VESA 300×300, ~16.8 kg (55-inch), better reflections (~4.0%).

Verdict: The LG QNED80’s slimmer design is elegant, but the TCL 5-Series’ smaller bezels and better reflection handling suit bright rooms.

---

Cost Comparison (in Kenyan Shillings)

Prices are estimated based on 2023/2020 pricing, adjusted for 2025 secondary/refurbished markets, using an exchange rate of 1 USD = 130 KSh (as of August 15, 2025, 07:37 PM EAT). Local pricing may vary due to import duties and availability. Check with retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or authorized dealers.

LG QNED80 Prices

• 50-inch: $600–$700 ≈ KSh 78,000–91,000
• 55-inch: $700–$800 ≈ KSh 91,000–104,000
• 65-inch: $900–$1,000 ≈ KSh 117,000–130,000
• 75-inch: $1,200–$1,400 ≈ KSh 156,000–182,000
• 86-inch: $1,800–$2,000 ≈ KSh 234,000–260,000

TCL Mini-LED 5-Series Prices

• 55-inch: $500–$600 ≈ KSh 65,000–78,000
• 65-inch: $700–$800 ≈ KSh 91,000–104,000
• 75-inch: $1,000–$1,200 ≈ KSh 130,000–156,000

Verdict on Cost: The TCL 5-Series is more affordable (~KSh 65,000–156,000 vs. ~KSh 78,000–260,000), offering better value. The LG QNED80’s higher cost reflects its gaming features and size range.

---

Target Audience

• LG QNED80:
• Ideal For: Families, gamers, and sports enthusiasts in moderately lit spaces. Its wide angles suit group viewing in Kenyan homes.
• Use Case: Best for sports, gaming, and streaming in varied lighting.
• Budget: KSh 78,000–260,000, for versatile performance seekers.
• TCL 5-Series:
• Ideal For: Budget-conscious cinephiles in brighter or controlled lighting. Its high contrast suits movie setups.
• Use Case: Ideal for movies and streaming in bright rooms.
• Budget: KSh 65,000–156,000, for value-driven buyers.

---

Final Verdict

Winner: TCL Mini-LED 5-Series

The TCL Mini-LED 5-Series is the superior choice for its higher brightness (~700 cd/m² vs. ~485 cd/m²), better contrast (~5,000:1 vs. ~1,291:1), and more dimming zones (~60 vs. ~6), delivering vibrant, cinematic visuals in bright Kenyan homes. Its affordability (~KSh 65,000–156,000) and Roku TV enhance value, though its 60Hz panel and lack of HDMI 2.1 limit gaming.

The LG QNED80 excels for gaming with 120Hz, HDMI 2.1, and lower input lag (~13.9ms vs. ~15ms), ideal for modern consoles and group viewing with wide angles (~38°). Its higher cost (~KSh 78,000–260,000) and low contrast are drawbacks.

Recommendation: Choose the TCL 5-Series for affordable, high-contrast viewing in bright rooms, with a budget of KSh 65,000–156,000, ideal for movies. Opt for the LG QNED80 for gaming and group viewing in moderate lighting, with a budget of KSh 78,000–260,000. Verify pricing and availability through Kenyan retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or authorized dealers as of August 15, 2025.

AURORA’S QUEST SATURDAY 16TH AUGUST 2025 FULL EPISODE PART 1 AND PART 2 COMBINED

LG QNED90 vs. TCL QM6: A Comprehensive Comparison for the Kenyan Market

For Kenyan consumers seeking a high-quality television in 2025, the LG QNED90 and TCL QM6 (assumed to be aligned with the TCL Q6/QM6K series, as QM6 is not explicitly listed but relates to TCL’s 2023/2024 QLED lineup) are two compelling options available in secondary or refurbished markets. The LG QNED90 (2021 model, e.g., 65QNED90UQA), a Mini-LED TV with NanoCell and quantum dot technology, offers wide viewing angles and vibrant colors. The TCL QM6, a QLED TV with full-array local dimming, delivers solid performance at a budget-friendly price. This article compares their quality, costs, and target audience, with prices in Kenyan Shillings (KSh) for local relevance.

---

Overview of the TVs

LG QNED90

The LG QNED90 (2021 model) is a 4K Mini-LED TV with an IPS panel, combining NanoCell and quantum dot technology for enhanced color accuracy. Powered by the α7 Gen 4 AI Processor and webOS, it’s designed for group viewing, gaming, and streaming in moderately lit environments, with Dolby Vision support and a sleek design.

TCL QM6

The TCL QM6 (aligned with Q6/QM6K, 2023/2024 models, e.g., 65Q650G) is a 4K QLED TV with a VA panel and full-array local dimming. Running on Google TV, it’s optimized for budget-conscious buyers seeking vibrant visuals and decent performance in brighter rooms, with support for multiple HDR formats and gaming features.

---

Quality Comparison

1. Picture Quality

• LG QNED90 (based on RTINGS.com,):
• Panel Type: IPS LCD with Mini-LED, full-array local dimming (~1,000 zones).
• Brightness: ~1,000 cd/m² (HDR 10% window), suitable for moderately lit rooms but less effective in very bright environments.
• Contrast: ~5,392:1 native, enhanced to ~114,686:1 with dimming, but IPS panel produces grayish blacks compared to VA panels.
• Color Performance: ~87.7% DCI-P3, ~60.45% Rec.2020, with accurate colors enhanced by NanoCell technology.
• Viewing Angles: Wide (~70° for color washout), ideal for group viewing.
• HDR Support: HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG, enhancing streaming content.
• Upscaling: α7 Gen 4 AI Processor provides solid upscaling (~7.5/10), improving low-resolution content.
• Reflections: Decent handling (~5.1% total reflections), but glossy finish can show glare in bright rooms.
• TCL QM6 (based on Q6/Q650G data from RTINGS.com, Tom’s Guide,):
• Panel Type: VA LCD with full-array local dimming (~200 zones).
• Brightness: ~600 cd/m² (HDR 10% window), ~550 cd/m² (SDR real scene), better for bright rooms than LG but less peak brightness.
• Contrast: ~10,000:1 with dimming (~5,000:1 native), delivering deeper blacks with some blooming.
• Color Performance: ~85% DCI-P3, vibrant but less accurate than LG.
• Viewing Angles: Narrow (~28° for color washout), suited for solo or small-group viewing.
• HDR Support: HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG, offering broad streaming compatibility.
• Upscaling: Decent (~6.5/10), with noticeable softness in low-quality content compared to LG.
• Reflections: Moderate handling (~6.0% total reflections), less effective than LG.

Verdict on Picture Quality: The LG QNED90 excels for group viewing with wide viewing angles (~70° vs. ~28°) and accurate colors (~87.7% DCI-P3), ideal for sports and streaming in moderately lit Kenyan homes. The TCL QM6 offers deeper blacks and solid brightness for brighter rooms, but its narrower viewing angles and blooming limit its cinematic depth. The LG’s Dolby Vision support matches the TCL’s, but its upscaling is superior.

2. Gaming Performance

• LG QNED90:
• Refresh Rate: 120Hz, 4K/120Hz via two HDMI 2.1 ports.
• Input Lag: ~14.3ms (4K@60Hz), ~5.8ms (4K@120Hz), responsive for gaming.
• Features: VRR, FreeSync, ALLM, HGiG, ideal for modern consoles.
• Game Mode: Wide viewing angles enhance multiplayer gaming.
• TCL QM6:
• Refresh Rate: 120Hz (some models up to 144Hz), 4K/120Hz via one HDMI 2.1 port.
• Input Lag: ~14.1ms (4K@60Hz), ~5.9ms (4K@120Hz), comparable to LG.
• Features: VRR, FreeSync, ALLM, but lacks HGiG.
• Game Mode: High contrast suits single-player games, but narrower angles limit multiplayer.

Verdict on Gaming: The LG QNED90 has a slight edge with two HDMI 2.1 ports and HGiG for HDR gaming, ideal for multiplayer setups. The TCL QM6 matches in responsiveness and supports higher refresh rates (up to 144Hz in some models), but its single HDMI 2.1 port and narrower angles are less versatile.

3. Sound Quality

• LG QNED90: 2.2-channel speakers, 40W output, Dolby Atmos via eARC, AI Sound Pro, decent bass (~7.8/10 score).
• TCL QM6: 2.0-channel speakers, 20W output, Dolby Atmos via eARC, adequate but weaker bass (~7.0/10 score).

Verdict on Sound: The LG QNED90 offers better audio with higher power (40W vs. 20W) and a richer soundstage. Both TVs benefit from a soundbar for immersive sound.

4. Smart Features and Connectivity

• LG QNED90: webOS, Magic Remote, AirPlay, HomeKit, Google Assistant/Alexa, four HDMI (two 2.1), two USB, Bluetooth 5.0, Wi-Fi 5.
• TCL QM6: Google TV, Chromecast, Google Assistant, three HDMI (one 2.1), one USB, Bluetooth 5.0, Wi-Fi 5.

Verdict on Smart Features: The LG QNED90’s webOS is more intuitive with Magic Remote and AirPlay/HomeKit support, ideal for smart homes. The TCL QM6’s Google TV offers broader app access and Chromecast, but its interface can feel cluttered. LG’s extra HDMI 2.1 port enhances connectivity.

5. Design and Build

• LG QNED90: Slim (~1.8 inches), thin bezels (~0.4 inches), VESA 400×400, ~69.2 lbs (65-inch), decent reflection handling (~5.1%).
• TCL QM6: Thicker (~3.0 inches), wider bezels (~0.5 inches), VESA 300×300, ~45 lbs (65-inch), moderate reflection handling (~6.0%).

Verdict on Design: The LG QNED90’s slimmer design and better reflection handling make it more elegant for modern Kenyan homes. The TCL QM6’s lighter build and sturdy stand are practical but less premium.

---

Cost Comparison (in Kenyan Shillings)

Prices are estimated based on 2021/2023 pricing, adjusted for 2025 secondary/refurbished markets, using an exchange rate of 1 USD = 130 KSh (as of August 14, 2025). Local pricing may vary due to import duties and availability. Check with retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or authorized dealers.

LG QNED90 Prices (based on RTINGS.com,)

• 55-inch: $800–$900 ≈ KSh 104,000–117,000
• 65-inch: $1,000–$1,200 ≈ KSh 130,000–156,000
• 75-inch: $1,300–$1,500 ≈ KSh 169,000–195,000

TCL QM6 Prices (based on Q6/Q650G pricing, RTINGS.com, Tom’s Guide)

• 55-inch: $400–$500 ≈ KSh 52,000–65,000
• 65-inch: $500–$600 ≈ KSh 65,000–78,000
• 75-inch: $700–$800 ≈ KSh 91,000–104,000

Verdict on Cost: The TCL QM6 is significantly more affordable (~KSh 52,000–104,000), offering excellent value for budget-conscious buyers. The LG QNED90 (~KSh 104,000–195,000) commands a premium for its wide viewing angles and premium features.

---

Target Audience

• LG QNED90:
• Ideal For: Families, sports enthusiasts, and gamers in moderately lit, open living spaces. Its wide viewing angles suit Kenyan homes with group viewing setups.
• Use Case: Best for sports, streaming, and multiplayer gaming in moderate lighting.
• Budget: KSh 104,000–195,000, for buyers seeking premium visuals and smart features.
• TCL QM6:
• Ideal For: Budget-conscious viewers, cinephiles, and casual gamers in brighter or controlled lighting environments. Its deep blacks and affordability suit cost-sensitive households.
• Use Case: Ideal for movies, streaming, and casual gaming in brighter rooms.
• Budget: KSh 52,000–104,000, for value-driven buyers.

---

Final Verdict

Winner: LG QNED90

The LG QNED90 is the superior choice for its wide viewing angles (~70° vs. ~28°), accurate colors (~87.7% DCI-P3), and better upscaling (~7.5/10 vs. ~6.5/10), making it ideal for group viewing, sports, and streaming in moderately lit Kenyan homes. Its two HDMI 2.1 ports, lower input lag (~14.3ms vs. ~14.1ms), and webOS with Magic Remote enhance gaming and usability, though its higher cost (~KSh 104,000–195,000) and glossy screen reflections are drawbacks.

The TCL QM6 offers excellent value with deeper blacks (~10,000:1 vs. ~5,392:1 native), Dolby Vision support, and affordability (~KSh 52,000–104,000), performing well in brighter rooms for movies and casual gaming. Its narrower viewing angles and weaker upscaling limit its suitability for group settings or low-quality content.

Recommendation: Choose the LG QNED90 for group-friendly viewing, gaming, and premium features in moderately lit spaces, with a budget of KSh 104,000–195,000. Opt for the TCL QM6 for affordable, vibrant visuals in brighter rooms, with a budget of KSh 52,000–104,000. Verify pricing and availability through Kenyan retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or authorized dealers.

AURORA’S QUEST MONDAY 18TH AUGUST 2025 FULL EPISODE PART 1 AND PART 2 COMBINED

LG QNED85 vs. Hisense U7G: A Comprehensive Comparison for the Kenyan Market

For Kenyan consumers seeking a high-quality television in 2025, the LG QNED85 and Hisense U7G are two compelling mid-to-high-end options, each leveraging advanced display technologies. The LG QNED85, a 2022 QNED model with Mini-LED and NanoCell technology, offers vibrant colors and wide viewing angles. The Hisense U7G, a 2021 QLED model with full-array local dimming, delivers deep blacks and impressive brightness at a competitive price. This article compares their quality, costs, and target audience to guide Kenyan buyers, with prices in Kenyan Shillings (KSh) for local relevance.

---

Overview of the TVs

LG QNED85

The LG QNED85 (2022 model, e.g., 75QNED85SQA) combines Mini-LED backlighting with NanoCell and quantum dot technology, using an IPS panel for wide viewing angles. Powered by the α7 Gen 5 AI Processor 4K and webOS, it’s designed for group viewing, streaming, and gaming in various lighting conditions, offering a premium experience with Dolby Vision.

Hisense U7G

The Hisense U7G (2021 model, e.g., 75U7G) is a QLED TV with a VA panel, full-array local dimming, and quantum dots, delivering high contrast and brightness. Running on Android TV, it’s optimized for dark-room viewing, gaming, and budget-conscious buyers seeking premium features, with support for both Dolby Vision and HDR10+.

---

Quality Comparison

1. Picture Quality

• LG QNED85 (based on RTINGS.com and Versus.com data):
• Panel Type: IPS LCD with Mini-LED, NanoCell, and quantum dots.
• Brightness: ~420 cd/m² (SDR real scene), ~613 cd/m² (HDR 10% window), suitable for moderately lit rooms but less effective in very bright environments.
• Contrast: Native contrast ~1,000:1, enhanced to ~13,834:1 with local dimming (6 zones), but IPS panel results in grayish blacks.
• Color Performance: Covers ~80% of DCI-P3, with accurate colors enhanced by NanoCell’s nanoparticle filtering for pure hues.
• Viewing Angles: Wide (~63° for color washout), ideal for group viewing in open spaces.
• HDR Support: Supports HDR10, Dolby Vision, and HLG, enhancing streaming content like Netflix.
• Upscaling: α7 Gen 5 AI Processor delivers solid upscaling, enhancing SD/HD content with good clarity.
• Reflections: Semi-gloss finish with ~5.0% total reflections, decent for bright rooms but not as effective as anti-reflective coatings.
• Hisense U7G (based on RTINGS.com and Versus.com data):
• Panel Type: VA LCD with full-array local dimming and quantum dots.
• Brightness: ~630 cd/m² (SDR real scene), ~1,158 cd/m² (HDR 10% window), excellent for bright rooms.
• Contrast: Native contrast ~4,426:1, enhanced to ~63,092:1 with local dimming (384 zones), delivering deep blacks with minimal blooming.
• Color Performance: Covers ~87.51% of DCI-P3 and ~64.21% of Rec.2020, offering vibrant colors but slightly less accurate than LG.
• Viewing Angles: Narrow (~26° for color washout), better for solo or small-group viewing.
• HDR Support: Supports HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, and HLG, providing broad streaming compatibility.
• Upscaling: Decent upscaling, but less refined than LG, with minor softness in low-quality content (~7.5 vs. ~7.0 score).
• Reflections: Glossy finish with ~5.4% total reflections, slightly less effective than LG.

Verdict on Picture Quality: The Hisense U7G outperforms in dark-room settings and bright environments with higher brightness (~1,158 cd/m² vs. ~613 cd/m² HDR) and superior contrast (~63,092:1 vs. ~13,834:1 with dimming), ideal for HDR content and movies. The LG QNED85 excels in group viewing with wide viewing angles (~63° vs. ~26°) and more accurate colors, but its lower contrast limits its cinematic depth.

2. Gaming Performance

• LG QNED85:
• Refresh Rate: 120Hz, supporting 4K/120Hz via two HDMI 2.1 ports.
• Input Lag: ~9.8ms at 4K@60Hz, highly responsive for gaming.
• Features: VRR, FreeSync, ALLM, and Game Optimizer, ideal for modern consoles.
• Game Mode: Wide viewing angles enhance multiplayer gaming.
• Hisense U7G:
• Refresh Rate: 120Hz, supporting 4K/120Hz via two HDMI 2.1 ports.
• Input Lag: ~15.0ms at 4K@60Hz, less responsive than LG.
• Features: VRR, FreeSync, ALLM, and Game Bar, suitable for gaming but lacks LG’s optimization.
• Game Mode: High contrast enhances dark scenes, but narrower viewing angles limit multiplayer.

Verdict on Gaming: The LG QNED85 is better for gaming with lower input lag (~9.8ms vs. ~15.0ms) and Game Optimizer, making it ideal for fast-paced and multiplayer gaming. The Hisense U7G offers solid gaming performance but is less responsive, better suited for single-player or cinematic games.

3. Sound Quality

• LG QNED85:
• 2.0-channel speakers with 20W output, supporting Dolby Atmos via eARC and Dolby Digital Plus.
• AI Sound Pro optimizes audio for content, but lacks depth without a soundbar.
• Decent for small rooms, but a soundbar is recommended for immersive audio.
• Hisense U7G:
• 2.0-channel speakers with 20W output, supporting Dolby Atmos and DTS Surround.
• Frequency response extends to ~80 Hz, offering slightly better bass than LG.
• Soundbar recommended for cinematic audio.

Verdict on Sound: Both TVs offer similar 20W audio with Dolby Atmos support via eARC, requiring a soundbar for immersive sound. The Hisense U7G’s DTS Surround provides a slight edge in bass, but the difference is minimal.

4. Smart Features and Connectivity

• LG QNED85:
• Platform: webOS, intuitive with Magic Remote, AirPlay, HomeKit, and app support (Netflix, YouTube).
• Voice Assistants: Google Assistant and Alexa built-in.
• Connectivity: Four HDMI ports (two HDMI 2.1), two USB ports, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth.
• AI Features: AI Picture Pro, AI Sound Pro, and ThinQ AI for smart home control.
• Hisense U7G:
• Platform: Android TV, robust with Chromecast, Google Play Store, and app support.
• Voice Assistants: Google Assistant built-in, Alexa via third-party devices.
• Connectivity: Four HDMI ports (two HDMI 2.1), two USB ports, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, 3.5mm audio jack, VGA connector.
• AI Features: Basic upscaling and content recommendations.

Verdict on Smart Features: The LG QNED85’s webOS with Magic Remote and AirPlay/HomeKit support is more intuitive and family-friendly. The Hisense U7G’s Android TV offers broader app access and Chromecast, but its interface can feel cluttered. The U7G’s additional connectivity (3.5mm jack, VGA) adds versatility.

5. Design and Build

• LG QNED85:
• Sleek design with thin bezels (~0.4 inches) and a wider stand, VESA mount support.
• Max thickness ~1.77 inches, lightweight at ~40.1 kg (75-inch).
• Semi-gloss screen with decent reflection handling (~5.0% total reflections).
• Hisense U7G:
• Modern design with thin bezels (~0.4 inches) and a sturdy stand.
• Max thickness ~3.3 inches, lighter at ~35.2 kg (75-inch).
• Glossy screen with slightly worse reflection handling (~5.4% total reflections).

Verdict on Design: The LG QNED85’s slimmer profile and VESA mount support make it more elegant and wall-mount-friendly. The Hisense U7G’s lighter build and sturdy stand are practical, but its thicker design is less premium.

---

Cost Comparison (in Kenyan Shillings)

Prices are estimated based on 2021–2022 pricing for the QNED85 and U7G, adjusted for 2025 secondary/refurbished markets, and converted using an exchange rate of 1 USD = 130 KSh (as of August 2025). Local pricing in Kenya may vary due to import duties, taxes, and limited availability. Check with retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or authorized LG/Hisense dealers for exact prices.

LG QNED85 Prices

Based on QNED85SQA pricing (B&H Photo, Versus.com):

• 55-inch: $800–$900 ≈ KSh 104,000–117,000
• 65-inch: $1,000–$1,200 ≈ KSh 130,000–156,000
• 75-inch: $1,100–$1,300 ≈ KSh 143,000–169,000
• 86-inch: $1,800–$2,000 ≈ KSh 234,000–260,000

Hisense U7G Prices

Based on U7G pricing (B&H Photo, Versus.com):

• 55-inch: $650–$750 ≈ KSh 84,500–97,500
• 65-inch: $800–$900 ≈ KSh 104,000–117,000
• 75-inch: $900–$1,000 ≈ KSh 117,000–130,000

Verdict on Cost: The Hisense U7G is more affordable, starting at ~KSh 84,500, offering excellent value for premium features. The LG QNED85, starting at ~KSh 104,000, is pricier but includes larger size options and a more polished design.

---

Target Audience

• LG QNED85:
• Ideal For: Families, social viewers, and those in bright or open living spaces. Its wide viewing angles suit Kenyan homes with large, social viewing areas.
• Use Case: Best for sports, streaming, and multiplayer gaming in moderately lit rooms.
• Budget: Appeals to buyers with KSh 104,000–260,000, seeking group-friendly visuals and smart features.
• Hisense U7G:
• Ideal For: Cinephiles, gamers, and budget-conscious buyers in darker or controlled lighting environments. Its high contrast and brightness suit dedicated movie or gaming setups.
• Use Case: Ideal for HDR movies, single-player gaming, and dark-room viewing.
• Budget: Targets buyers with KSh 84,500–130,000, prioritizing value and performance.

---

Final Verdict

Winner: Hisense U7G

The Hisense U7G takes the lead for its superior contrast (~63,092:1 vs. ~13,834:1 with dimming), higher brightness (~1,158 cd/m² vs. ~613 cd/m² HDR), and broader HDR support (including Dolby Vision and HDR10+), making it ideal for cinematic experiences and bright-room viewing. Its affordability (~KSh 84,500–130,000) and solid gaming features (120Hz, VRR) offer exceptional value for Kenyan buyers, though its narrower viewing angles (~26°) limit group viewing.

The LG QNED85 excels in group settings with wide viewing angles (~63°) and a polished webOS platform with Magic Remote, ideal for family gatherings and streaming. Its lower input lag (~9.8ms vs. ~15.0ms) enhances gaming, but its lower contrast and brightness reduce its HDR impact compared to the U7G.

Recommendation: Choose the Hisense U7G if you prioritize cinematic quality, bright-room performance, and value for movies and gaming, with a budget of KSh 84,500–130,000. Opt for the LG QNED85 if you need a group-friendly TV for sports and streaming in bright, open spaces, with a budget of KSh 104,000–260,000. Verify pricing and availability through Kenyan retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or authorized dealers.

AURORA’S QUEST FRIDAY 15TH AUGUST 2025 FULL EPISODE PART 1 AND PART 2 COMBINED

Samsung QLED Q80G vs. LG OLED B8: A Comprehensive Comparison for the Kenyan Market

When selecting a premium television for your Kenyan home, the Samsung QLED Q80G and the LG OLED B8 represent two distinct display technologies catering to different viewing preferences. The Samsung Q80G, a 2025 mid-range QLED TV, leverages quantum dots and full-array local dimming for bright, vibrant visuals. The LG B8, a 2018 OLED model, offers perfect blacks and wide viewing angles, ideal for cinematic experiences. This article compares their quality, costs, and target audience to guide Kenyan consumers, with prices in Kenyan Shillings (KSh) for local relevance.

---

Overview of the TVs

Samsung QLED Q80G

The Samsung QLED Q80G is part of Samsung’s 2025 QLED lineup, succeeding models like the Q80D. It features a VA panel with full-array local dimming, quantum dots, and the Quantum Processor 4K, delivering high brightness and contrast. Running on Tizen OS, it’s designed for bright rooms, gaming, and versatile content consumption, with robust smart features and gaming enhancements.

LG OLED B8

The LG OLED B8, released in 2018, is an OLED TV powered by the α9 Intelligent Processor, offering pixel-level dimming for infinite contrast and perfect blacks. Despite its age, it remains a premium choice for dark-room viewing and cinematic content, with wide viewing angles and webOS for a user-friendly smart experience. Its availability in Kenya may be limited to refurbished or secondary markets.

---

Quality Comparison

1. Picture Quality

• Samsung QLED Q80G (based on Q80D data from RTINGS.com and Tom’s Guide):
• Panel Type: VA LCD with full-array local dimming and quantum dots.
• Brightness: Approximately 689 cd/m² (SDR real scene) and 875 cd/m² (HDR real scene), ideal for bright rooms.
• Contrast: Native contrast ratio of ~3,681:1, enhanced to ~5,721:1 with local dimming, delivering deep blacks with minimal blooming.
• Color Performance: Covers ~89.95% of DCI-P3 and ~67.44% of Rec.2020, offering vibrant, accurate colors.
• Viewing Angles: Limited to ~34° for color washout, better for solo or small-group viewing.
• HDR Support: Supports HDR10, HDR10+, and HLG, but lacks Dolby Vision.
• Upscaling: Quantum Processor 4K provides solid upscaling, enhancing non-4K content with good clarity.
• LG OLED B8 (based on RTINGS.com data):
• Panel Type: OLED with self-emissive pixels (WRGB sub-type).
• Brightness: ~288 cd/m² (SDR real scene) and ~548 cd/m² (HDR real scene), better suited for dark rooms.
• Contrast: Infinite contrast ratio due to pixel-level dimming, delivering perfect blacks and exceptional shadow detail.
• Color Performance: Covers ~96.25% of DCI-P3 and ~70.64% of Rec.2020, with excellent color accuracy.
• Viewing Angles: Wide at ~48° for color washout, ideal for group viewing.
• HDR Support: Supports HDR10, Dolby Vision, and HLG, with Dolby Vision enhancing streaming content.
• Upscaling: α9 processor excels at upscaling, rendering SD/HD content sharply.

Verdict on Picture Quality: The LG B8 outperforms in dark-room settings with perfect blacks, infinite contrast, and wide viewing angles, making it ideal for movies and HDR content. The Samsung Q80G excels in bright rooms with higher brightness and vibrant colors, though its VA panel limits viewing angles.

2. Gaming Performance

• Samsung QLED Q80G:
• Refresh Rate: Likely 120Hz (based on Q80D), supporting 4K/120Hz for consoles.
• Input Lag: ~14.7ms at 4K@60Hz, responsive for gaming.
• Features: Includes ALLM, FreeSync, VRR, and Samsung Gaming Hub; likely four HDMI 2.1 ports for next-gen consoles.
• Game Mode: Maintains bright HDR visuals with low latency.
• LG OLED B8:
• Refresh Rate: 120Hz, supporting 1080p/120Hz but not 4K/120Hz due to HDMI 2.0 limitations.
• Input Lag: ~21.3ms at 4K@60Hz, slightly higher but still responsive.
• Features: Includes ALLM but lacks VRR and FreeSync, limiting compatibility with modern consoles.
• Game Mode: OLED’s fast response time (~0.3ms) ensures crisp motion.

Verdict on Gaming: The Samsung Q80G is superior for modern gaming with VRR, FreeSync, and HDMI 2.1 support, ideal for PS5/Xbox Series X. The LG B8’s fast response time benefits motion clarity, but its older tech limits next-gen gaming capabilities.

3. Sound Quality

• Samsung QLED Q80G:
• Likely 2.2-channel speakers with 40W output (based on Q80D), supporting Object Tracking Sound and Dolby Atmos via eARC.
• Q-Symphony enhances audio with compatible Samsung soundbars.
• Clear dialogue and decent immersion, though a soundbar is recommended.
• LG OLED B8:
• 2.2-channel speakers with 40W output, including a woofer for deeper bass.
• Supports Dolby Atmos natively, delivering immersive sound.
• AI Sound Pro optimizes audio, but lacks advanced features like Q-Symphony.

Verdict on Sound: Both TVs offer comparable 40W audio with Dolby Atmos support, but the LG B8’s native Atmos and woofer provide a slightly richer soundstage. The Q80G’s Q-Symphony gives it an edge with Samsung soundbars.

4. Smart Features and Connectivity

• Samsung QLED Q80G:
• Platform: Tizen OS, fluid with Smart Hub, Samsung TV Plus, and app support (Netflix, YouTube).
• Voice Assistants: Bixby, Alexa, and Google Assistant via third-party devices.
• Connectivity: Four HDMI 2.1 ports, two USB ports, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Ethernet.
• AI Features: Quantum Processor 4K enhances upscaling and content recommendations.
• LG OLED B8:
• Platform: webOS 4.0, intuitive with Magic Remote and app support (Netflix, YouTube).
• Voice Assistants: Google Assistant and Alexa built-in.
• Connectivity: Four HDMI 2.0 ports, three USB ports, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth.
• AI Features: ThinQ AI optimizes picture and sound, with strong app integration.

Verdict on Smart Features: The Samsung Q80G’s Tizen OS and HDMI 2.1 ports offer a modern edge, especially for gaming. The LG B8’s webOS with Magic Remote is highly intuitive, but its older HDMI 2.0 ports limit next-gen connectivity.

5. Design and Build

• Samsung QLED Q80G:
• AirSlim design with slim bezels and a central stand, suitable for tabletop or wall-mounting.
• Reflective screen may cause glare in bright rooms.
• Solar-powered remote for eco-friendly operation.
• LG OLED B8:
• Ultra-slim OLED design with minimal bezels and a central stand, ideal for wall-mounting.
• Glossy screen with decent reflection handling (1.5% total reflections).
• Magic Remote enhances navigation.

Verdict on Design: The LG B8’s slimmer OLED design and better reflection handling give it a premium aesthetic. The Q80G’s design is sleek but less effective against glare.

---

Cost Comparison (in Kenyan Shillings)

Prices are estimated based on international pricing (from RTINGS.com, Tom’s Guide, and kenyaprice.com) and converted using an exchange rate of 1 USD = 130 KSh (as of August 2025). Local pricing in Kenya may vary due to import duties, taxes, and retailer margins. Check with retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or Samsung/LG authorized dealers for exact prices.

Samsung QLED Q80G Prices

Based on Q80D pricing trends:

• 55-inch: $1,000–$1,200 ≈ KSh 130,000–156,000
• 65-inch: $1,300–$1,500 ≈ KSh 169,000–195,000
• 75-inch: $1,800–$2,000 ≈ KSh 234,000–260,000
• 85-inch: $2,500–$2,800 ≈ KSh 325,000–364,000

Discounts during sales (e.g., Black Friday) may lower the 55-inch model to ~KSh 120,000.

LG OLED B8 Prices

As a 2018 model, the B8 is discontinued but available refurbished or in secondary markets:

• 55-inch: $1,200–$1,500 (refurbished) ≈ KSh 156,000–195,000
• 65-inch: $1,800–$2,200 (refurbished) ≈ KSh 234,000–286,000

Availability in Kenya may be limited, and prices could be higher due to import costs.

Verdict on Cost: The Samsung Q80G is competitively priced for a 2025 model, starting at ~KSh 130,000, with broader availability. The LG B8, while potentially cheaper refurbished (~KSh 156,000+), is harder to source and may carry import premiums.

---

Target Audience

• Samsung QLED Q80G:
• Ideal For: Casual viewers, gamers, and those in bright living rooms. Its high brightness and gaming features suit Kenyan homes with open, sunlit spaces.
• Use Case: Best for sports, gaming, and mixed content in moderately lit environments.
• Budget: Appeals to buyers with KSh 130,000–364,000, seeking modern features and reliability.
• LG OLED B8:
• Ideal For: Cinephiles and viewers in dark or controlled lighting environments. Its perfect blacks and wide viewing angles are perfect for movie nights or group viewing.
• Use Case: Ideal for HDR movies, dark-room viewing, and cinematic experiences.
• Budget: Targets buyers with KSh 156,000–286,000, willing to seek refurbished units for premium quality.

---

Final Verdict

Winner: LG OLED B8

The LG OLED B8 takes the crown for its superior picture quality, with infinite contrast, perfect blacks, and wide viewing angles, making it the best choice for cinematic experiences and dark-room viewing. Its Dolby Vision support and excellent upscaling enhance streaming and movie content, despite its age. However, its limited availability in Kenya, higher input lag, and lack of modern gaming features like VRR may deter some buyers.

The Samsung QLED Q80G is a strong contender for bright-room performance, with higher brightness (~689 cd/m² vs. ~288 cd/m² SDR), vibrant colors, and advanced gaming features (VRR, FreeSync, HDMI 2.1). It’s more versatile for varied content and modern consoles, with broader availability and a competitive price. Its narrower viewing angles and lack of Dolby Vision are drawbacks for group viewing and streaming enthusiasts.

Recommendation: Choose the LG OLED B8 if you prioritize cinematic quality for movies in darker settings and can source a refurbished unit within KSh 156,000–286,000. Opt for the Samsung QLED Q80G if you need a versatile, bright-room TV with gaming capabilities and a budget of KSh 130,000–364,000. Verify pricing and availability through Kenyan retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or authorized dealers.

AURORA’S QUEST THURSDAY 14TH AUGUST 2025 FULL EPISODE PART 1 AND PART 2 COMBINED

Samsung QLED QN90F vs. LG NanoCell 95U: A Comprehensive Comparison for the Kenyan Market

When choosing a premium television in Kenya, two standout options for 2025 are the Samsung QN90F Neo QLED and the LG NanoCell 95U. Both TVs offer cutting-edge technology, but they cater to different viewing preferences and budgets. This article compares their quality, costs, and target audience to help Kenyan consumers make an informed decision.

---

Overview of the TVs

Samsung QN90F Neo QLED

The Samsung QN90F is a flagship 4K Mini-LED TV for 2025, succeeding the QN90D. It leverages quantum dot technology and Mini-LED backlighting to deliver high brightness, vibrant colors, and precise contrast. With features like a 165Hz refresh rate, advanced anti-glare technology, and Samsung’s Tizen 9.0 smart platform, it’s designed for premium performance across various viewing scenarios, particularly in bright environments.

LG NanoCell 95U

The LG NanoCell 95U is a high-end 4K LED TV that uses LG’s NanoCell technology to enhance color purity and viewing angles. It features an IPS panel, which prioritizes wide viewing angles, making it ideal for group viewing. Equipped with LG’s webOS platform and advanced AI processing, the 95U aims to deliver a balanced performance for movies, sports, and casual viewing.

---

Quality Comparison

1. Picture Quality

• Samsung QN90F:
• Panel Type: VA LCD with Mini-LED backlighting and quantum dots.
• Brightness: Achieves peak brightness of approximately 2,086–2,500 nits in HDR Movie mode, making it exceptionally suited for bright rooms.
• Contrast: Offers a native contrast ratio of around 4,854:1, with deep blacks and minimal blooming due to refined local dimming (900 dimming zones in the 65-inch model).
• Color Performance: Covers 93.6% of the DCI-P3 color gamut and 76.5% of BT.2020, delivering vibrant and accurate colors.
• Viewing Angles: Improved with Wide Viewing Angle technology, but VA panels inherently have narrower viewing angles compared to IPS panels, leading to some color and contrast loss off-axis.
• HDR Support: Supports HDR10, HDR10+, and HLG, but lacks Dolby Vision.
• Upscaling: The NQ4 AI Gen3 processor provides excellent 4K upscaling, enhancing lower-resolution content with sharp details and minimal noise.
• LG NanoCell 95U:
• Panel Type: IPS LCD with NanoCell technology and Direct LED backlighting.
• Brightness: Specific brightness figures for the 95U are unavailable, but LG NanoCell TVs typically reach around 500–600 nits, significantly lower than the QN90F. Based on comparisons of similar models (e.g., Nano76), brightness is adequate but struggles in very bright rooms.
• Contrast: Lower contrast ratio (around 770:1 in similar NanoCell models), resulting in less deep blacks and more grayish tones in dark scenes.
• Color Performance: Covers approximately 58% of DCI-P3, which is less vibrant than the QN90F’s quantum dot-enhanced colors.
• Viewing Angles: IPS panels excel here, offering wide viewing angles with minimal color or contrast degradation, ideal for group viewing.
• HDR Support: Likely supports HDR10, HLG, and Dolby Vision, providing a slight edge over the QN90F for Dolby Vision content.
• Upscaling: LG’s α9 or α8 AI processor (depending on the model) provides solid upscaling, though it may not match the QN90F’s AI-driven precision.

Verdict on Picture Quality: The Samsung QN90F outperforms the LG NanoCell 95U in brightness, contrast, and color vibrancy, making it superior for HDR content and bright-room viewing. However, the 95U’s IPS panel ensures better viewing angles, which is a significant advantage for group settings.

2. Gaming Performance

• Samsung QN90F:
• Refresh Rate: Up to 165Hz, ideal for PC gamers with high-end setups, though consoles are limited to 4K/120Hz.
• Input Lag: Low, at 9.2ms for 4K@60Hz, ensuring responsive gameplay.
• Features: Four HDMI 2.1 ports, VRR, FreeSync Premium Pro, ALLM, and Samsung’s Gaming Hub for cloud gaming.
• Game Mode: Maintains strong HDR brightness, but zone transitions can be less smooth.
• LG NanoCell 95U:
• Refresh Rate: Likely 120Hz, based on similar NanoCell models, sufficient for current-gen consoles.
• Input Lag: Around 9.8ms in similar models (e.g., Nano76), slightly higher than the QN90F but still responsive.
• Features: Expected to include HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, and integration with Xbox Game Pass, but may lack the QN90F’s advanced gaming hub.
• Game Mode: Good for group gaming due to wide viewing angles, but lower contrast impacts dark scenes.

Verdict on Gaming: The QN90F is the better gaming TV due to its higher refresh rate, lower input lag, and robust gaming features. The 95U remains a solid choice for casual gamers, especially in group settings.

3. Sound Quality

• Samsung QN90F:
• Features a 4.2.2-channel speaker system with 60W output, supporting Dolby Atmos, Object Tracking Sound Pro+, and Active Voice Amplifier Pro for clear dialogue.
• Q-Symphony enhances sound when paired with a compatible Samsung soundbar.
• Delivers dynamic and immersive audio, suitable for most viewing scenarios.
• LG NanoCell 95U:
• Likely features a 2.0-channel system with 20W output, based on similar models like the Nano76.
• Supports Dolby Atmos via HDMI eARC, but lacks advanced sound features like Object Tracking Sound.
• Sound quality is adequate but may require a soundbar for a cinematic experience.

Verdict on Sound: The QN90F offers superior audio with its more powerful and immersive sound system, while the 95U’s audio is functional but less impressive.

4. Smart Features and Connectivity

• Samsung QN90F:
• Platform: Tizen 9.0, highly customizable with AI-driven content recommendations, Samsung TV Plus, and the Art Store.
• Voice Assistants: Bixby and Alexa, with far-field mics for hands-free control.
• Connectivity: Four HDMI 2.1 ports, two USB ports, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.3, and Apple AirPlay.
• AI Features: Samsung Vision AI offers limited but evolving features like Click to Search and Live Translate.
• LG NanoCell 95U:
• Platform: webOS 22 or newer, user-friendly with a row-based app layout and support for Apple AirPlay and HomeKit.
• Voice Assistants: Google Assistant and Alexa, with potential integration of Microsoft’s Copilot AI.
• Connectivity: Likely three HDMI 2.0 ports (based on Nano76), two USB ports, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth.
• AI Features: Enhanced AI picture and sound optimization, plus Xbox Game Pass integration.

Verdict on Smart Features: Both TVs offer robust smart platforms, but the QN90F’s Tizen 9.0 is more advanced and customizable. The 95U’s webOS is intuitive and supports additional features like HomeKit, making it a strong contender.

5. Design and Build

• Samsung QN90F:
• Sleek, minimalistic design with a slim frame and pedestal stand, suitable for wall-mounting or tabletop use.
• Features a glare-free matte finish, reducing reflections in bright rooms.
• Includes a solar-powered remote, eliminating battery replacements.
• LG NanoCell 95U:
• Likely features a standard LG design with a wider stand, based on NanoCell models.
• Less effective anti-glare coating compared to the QN90F, but still functional.
• Includes a standard remote with voice control capabilities.

Verdict on Design: The QN90F’s premium, slim design and innovative remote give it an edge, though the 95U’s design is practical and unobtrusive.

---

Cost Comparison (in Kenyan Shillings)

To provide accurate pricing for the Kenyan market, we’ve converted international prices (from sources like TechRadar and Tom’s Guide) to Kenyan Shillings (KSh) using an exchange rate of approximately 1 USD = 130 KSh (as of August 2025). Note that local pricing may vary due to import duties, taxes, and retailer margins in Kenya. Always check with local retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or authorized dealers for exact prices.

Samsung QN90F Prices

• 43-inch: $1,299.99 ≈ KSh 168,999
• 50-inch: $1,499.99 ≈ KSh 195,000
• 55-inch: $1,799.99 ≈ KSh 234,000
• 65-inch: $2,499.99 ≈ KSh 325,000
• 75-inch: $2,999.99 ≈ KSh 390,000
• 85-inch: $4,499.99 ≈ KSh 585,000
• 98-inch: $14,999.99 ≈ KSh 1,950,000

Discounts are common mid-year, with the 65-inch model potentially dropping to around KSh 247,000, based on trends with the QN90D.

LG NanoCell 95U Prices

Specific pricing for the 95U is unavailable, but based on similar NanoCell models (e.g., Nano76) and LG’s pricing trends, we estimate:

• 43-inch: ~KSh 110,000–130,000
• 55-inch: ~KSh 150,000–180,000
• 65-inch: ~KSh 200,000–250,000
• 75-inch: ~KSh 280,000–350,000
• 86-inch: ~KSh 400,000–500,000

The 95U, as a higher-end NanoCell model, may command a premium over these estimates but is likely cheaper than the QN90F at similar sizes.

Verdict on Cost: The LG NanoCell 95U is more affordable, offering a better price-to-performance ratio for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung QN90F, while pricier, justifies its cost with superior performance in brightness, contrast, and gaming features.

---

Target Audience

• Samsung QN90F:
• Ideal For: Enthusiasts seeking top-tier picture quality, gamers, and those with bright living rooms. Its high brightness and contrast make it perfect for watching movies, sports, or gaming in well-lit environments like modern Kenyan homes with large windows.
• Use Case: Best for solo or small-group viewing where premium HDR performance and gaming capabilities are priorities.
• Budget: Appeals to buyers willing to spend KSh 234,000–585,000 for a high-end TV.
• LG NanoCell 95U:
• Ideal For: Families or social viewers who prioritize wide viewing angles for group settings, such as watching sports or movies together in living rooms or entertainment spaces.
• Use Case: Suited for casual viewing, sports, and streaming, with good performance in moderately lit rooms.
• Budget: Targets buyers looking for a premium TV at a lower cost, around KSh 150,000–400,000.

---

Final Verdict

Winner: Samsung QN90F Neo QLED

The Samsung QN90F emerges as the superior TV due to its exceptional brightness, contrast, and gaming performance, making it a standout choice for Kenyan consumers seeking a premium viewing experience. Its Mini-LED technology and quantum dots deliver vibrant HDR content, while the 165Hz refresh rate and low input lag cater to gamers. The glare-free screen is a game-changer for bright Kenyan homes, and the Tizen 9.0 platform adds versatility. However, its higher price (starting at ~KSh 168,999) may deter budget-conscious buyers.

The LG NanoCell 95U is a strong contender for those prioritizing affordability and wide viewing angles. Its IPS panel ensures consistent picture quality for group viewing, making it ideal for family gatherings or sports events. While it lags in brightness and contrast, its estimated lower price range (~KSh 150,000–400,000) and Dolby Vision support make it appealing for casual viewers.

Recommendation: Choose the Samsung QN90F if you value top-tier picture quality, gaming, and bright-room performance and can afford the premium. Opt for the LG NanoCell 95U if you need a cost-effective TV for group viewing in moderately lit spaces. Always verify local pricing and availability through Kenyan retailers like Jumia, Kilimall, or Samsung/LG authorized dealers.

AURORA’S QUEST WEDNESDAY 13TH AUGUST 2025 FULL EPISODE PART 1 AND PART 2 COMBINED

Samsung Crystal UHD 4K Ultra vs. LG OLED evo C6: A Comparison for Kenyan Buyers

For Kenyan consumers seeking a 4K television in 2025, the Samsung Crystal UHD 4K Ultra (e.g., DU9000 series, 2024) and the LG OLED evo C6 (2025) represent two distinct tiers of TV technology. The Crystal UHD 4K Ultra is an entry-level LED TV with Samsung’s Crystal Processor 4K, designed for affordability and solid performance. In contrast, the OLED evo C6 is LG’s mid-range OLED, offering superior picture quality with its self-emissive panel and advanced processing. This article compares their picture quality, performance, and costs in Kenyan shillings, tailored to Kenyan viewing habits and market dynamics, to determine the winner and ideal audience.

---

Understanding the Technologies: Crystal UHD vs. OLED

• Samsung Crystal UHD 4K Ultra (LCD-based): The Crystal UHD 4K Ultra uses an LED backlight with a VA panel and Dynamic Crystal Color technology for enhanced color vibrancy. Powered by the Crystal Processor 4K, it delivers 4K resolution (3840×2160) with decent upscaling and smart features via Tizen OS. It’s an affordable option for everyday viewing, lacking advanced features like local dimming or quantum dots found in QLEDs.
• LG OLED evo C6 (OLED): The C6 features LG’s OLED evo WOLED panel with Micro Lens Array (MLA) technology, where each pixel emits its own light, delivering perfect blacks and infinite contrast. Powered by the α11 AI Processor Gen 2, it offers exceptional brightness, image processing, and gaming capabilities, positioning it as a premium mid-range choice for cinematic and gaming experiences.

These technologies—LED-backlit Crystal UHD versus self-emissive OLED—cater to different Kenyan needs, from budget-friendly setups in rural homes to high-end home theaters in urban areas.

---

Picture Quality Comparison

Contrast and Black Levels

• LG OLED evo C6: The C6’s OLED panel delivers perfect black levels and an infinite contrast ratio, as each pixel can turn off completely, eliminating light bleed. This produces stunning depth in dark scenes, ideal for watching films like Rafiki or The Lion King in dimly lit Kenyan living rooms during evening family time.
• Samsung Crystal UHD 4K Ultra: The VA panel offers a decent contrast ratio (~6,000:1–7,000:1), with deeper blacks than IPS panels. Its edge-lit backlight lacks local dimming, leading to grayish blacks and light bleed in high-contrast scenes, less suited for dark-room viewing.

Winner: LG C6 for its perfect blacks and infinite contrast, ideal for cinematic viewing in darker settings.

Brightness

• Samsung Crystal UHD 4K Ultra: Achieves moderate brightness (~300–400 cd/m² in HDR, ~250–300 cd/m² in SDR real scenes), sufficient for dimly lit rooms but less effective in bright Kenyan living rooms with large windows, common in Nairobi or Mombasa. Its semi-gloss finish has moderate reflection handling (~5.5% total reflections).
• LG OLED evo C6: Reaches ~1,103 cd/m² in HDR and ~1,049 cd/m² in SDR (10% window), a significant improvement for OLEDs, making it competitive in moderately lit rooms. Its glossy finish offers excellent reflection handling (~1.5% total reflections), though it’s not as bright as Mini-LED TVs in very sunny conditions.

Winner: LG C6 for its higher brightness and better reflection handling, suitable for varied Kenyan lighting conditions.

Color Performance

• LG OLED evo C6: Covers ~99.39% DCI-P3 with excellent color accuracy (color dE 0.97 pre-calibration) and supports Dolby Vision, enhancing HDR content like Maisha Magic shows or international films with vibrant, lifelike colors and smooth gradients.
• Samsung Crystal UHD 4K Ultra: Covers ~75–80% DCI-P3 with decent color vibrancy via Dynamic Crystal Color, supporting HDR10+ but not Dolby Vision. Its colors are less accurate (color dE ~3.0 pre-calibration) and show more banding in gradients.

Winner: LG C6 for its wider color gamut, superior accuracy, and Dolby Vision support, ideal for HDR enthusiasts.

Viewing Angles

• LG OLED evo C6: Offers wide viewing angles (color washout at ~65°, black level raise at ~70°), maintaining consistent color and contrast, perfect for Kenyan family gatherings watching football or Tinsel from various angles.
• Samsung Crystal UHD 4K Ultra: The VA panel has narrower viewing angles (color washout at ~27°, black level raise at ~19°), with degradation off-axis, better suited for straight-on viewing in smaller Kenyan setups.

Winner: LG C6 for its wide viewing angles, ideal for group viewing.

Motion Handling and Gaming

• LG OLED evo C6: Features a near-instantaneous response time (0.4ms at 80%), eliminating motion blur for sports like the Kenyan Premier League. It supports 4K/144Hz, VRR, ALLM, G-Sync/FreeSync, and Dolby Vision gaming across four HDMI 2.1 ports, with input lag ~9.2ms, ideal for Kenyan gamers on PS5 or PC.
• Samsung Crystal UHD 4K Ultra: Has a slower response time (~10–15ms), leading to slight motion blur. It’s limited to 60Hz, ALLM, and lacks HDMI 2.1 or VRR, with input lag ~9.7ms, suitable for casual gaming but not next-gen consoles.

Winner: LG C6 for its superior motion handling and gaming features, ideal for Kenyan gamers.

Burn-In Risk

• LG OLED evo C6: OLEDs risk burn-in with prolonged static content (e.g., Citizen TV news tickers, Safaricom app interfaces). LG’s anti-burn-in features (pixel shifting, screen savers) mitigate this, but it remains a concern.
• Samsung Crystal UHD 4K Ultra: LCD-based, it’s immune to burn-in, making it safer for static content common in Kenyan homes.

Winner: Samsung Crystal UHD 4K Ultra for its burn-in immunity, appealing to static content users.

---

Cost Comparison (Kenyan Market)

Pricing in Kenya varies by retailer (e.g., Jumia, Kilimall, Hotpoint, LG Brand Shops), import duties, and promotions like Black Friday. Based on 2025 trends for a 55-inch model:

• Samsung Crystal UHD 4K Ultra (55”): Retails around KES 75,000–95,000 (approx. $580–$730 USD), reflecting its 2024 release and entry-level status. Sales may lower it to ~KES 70,000, making it highly affordable for Kenyan buyers.
• LG OLED evo C6 (55”): Priced significantly higher at KES 230,000–280,000 (approx. $1,770–$2,150 USD), due to its 2025 release and premium OLED technology. Discounts may reduce it to ~KES 210,000, but it remains a premium investment.

Winner: Samsung Crystal UHD 4K Ultra for its affordability, ideal for budget-conscious Kenyan buyers.

---

Additional Considerations

Smart Features and Software

• LG OLED evo C6: Runs on webOS 25, a user-friendly platform with apps like Netflix, Showmax, and YouTube, popular in Kenya. It supports AirPlay 2, HomeKit, and voice-activated profiles, appealing to urban Kenyan smart homes. The Magic Remote enhances navigation.
• Samsung Crystal UHD 4K Ultra: Uses Tizen OS, offering Samsung TV Plus, Netflix, and voice control (Bixby, Alexa, Google Assistant). It lacks HomeKit, limiting smart home integration for some Kenyan users.

Winner: LG C6 for its HomeKit support and intuitive webOS, ideal for Kenya’s tech-savvy market.

Sound Quality

• LG OLED evo C6: Features Dolby Atmos and 2.2-channel speakers (40W) with AI Sound Pro, delivering immersive audio for Kenyan viewers watching local music shows or films. A soundbar is recommended for larger rooms.
• Samsung Crystal UHD 4K Ultra: Includes Object Tracking Sound Lite and 2.0-channel speakers (20W), offering clear but less dynamic audio. A soundbar is also advised.

Winner: LG C6 for its Atmos support and more powerful audio.

Durability and Longevity

• LG OLED evo C6: OLED panels may degrade over time, reducing brightness after heavy use, with burn-in risk despite mitigation features. Lifespan is ~30,000 hours (3 hours daily for 27 years).
• Samsung Crystal UHD 4K Ultra: LCD panels are more durable, with no burn-in risk and better brightness retention (~40,000–100,000 hours), ideal for heavy use in Kenyan homes.

Winner: Samsung Crystal UHD 4K Ultra for its durability and burn-in immunity.

---

Final Verdict: Which TV Wins for Kenyan Buyers?

The LG OLED evo C6 is the superior choice for picture quality and versatility, offering perfect blacks, infinite contrast, wide viewing angles, and advanced gaming features (4K/144Hz, Dolby Vision gaming). Its brightness (~1,103 cd/m² HDR) and webOS platform make it ideal for movie enthusiasts, competitive gamers, and group viewing in darker or moderately lit Kenyan homes, such as urban apartments in Nairobi or Kisumu. Its premium price (KES 230,000–280,000) targets affluent buyers seeking cinematic excellence.

The Samsung Crystal UHD 4K Ultra excels in affordability (KES 75,000–95,000) and durability, with decent contrast (~6,000:1) and brightness (~300–400 cd/m²) for budget-conscious Kenyan families in dimly lit rooms or with static content needs (e.g., Citizen TV, Safaricom apps). Its narrower viewing angles and limited gaming features make it less versatile.

Target Audience in Kenya

• LG OLED evo C6: Ideal for affluent Kenyan households, home theater enthusiasts, and gamers in urban areas who prioritize cinematic visuals, Dolby Vision, and gaming performance in darker or controlled lighting. It suits buyers watching Maisha Magic or international sports with family or friends.
• Samsung Crystal UHD 4K Ultra: Best for budget-conscious families, casual viewers, and those with static content needs across Kenya’s urban and rural areas. It’s perfect for straight-on viewing of local channels or streaming in smaller, dimly lit setups.

The Winner

The LG OLED evo C6 takes the crown for its unmatched picture quality, gaming prowess, and versatility, making it the better choice for Kenyan buyers seeking a premium TV experience in 2025. The Samsung Crystal UHD 4K Ultra is a strong alternative for budget shoppers or those prioritizing durability and affordability, but it lags significantly in performance. Choose based on your budget, room lighting, and viewing priorities in your Kenyan home.

AURORA’S QUEST TUESDAY 12TH AUGUST 2025 FULL EPISODE PART 1 AND PART 2 COMBINED

Samsung QLED QN90B vs. LG NanoCell 99 Series: A Comprehensive Comparison

In the competitive world of premium 4K and 8K televisions, the Samsung QLED QN90B (2022) and the LG NanoCell 99 Series (e.g., NANO99 8K, 2021) stand out as high-end options from two leading brands. The QN90B is a flagship 4K QLED TV leveraging Mini-LED technology, while the NanoCell 99 Series is LG’s top-tier 8K LCD TV with NanoCell technology. This article compares their picture quality, performance, cost, and target audience to determine the winner and who each TV best serves.

---

Understanding the Technologies: QLED vs. NanoCell

• Samsung QLED QN90B (LCD-based QLED): The QN90B is a Neo QLED model that combines quantum dot technology with a Mini-LED backlight, offering superior brightness, contrast, and local dimming compared to standard QLEDs. It uses a VA panel (except in smaller sizes) with Samsung’s Ultra Viewing Angle layer, balancing high contrast with improved viewing angles.
• LG NanoCell 99 Series (LCD-based NanoCell): The NanoCell 99 Series is an 8K TV that uses LG’s NanoCell technology, incorporating a nanoparticle layer to enhance color purity. It features an IPS panel with full-array local dimming (FALD) and is powered by LG’s α9 Gen 4 processor, optimized for 8K upscaling and color accuracy.

These technologies cater to different priorities, with QLED focusing on brightness and contrast and NanoCell emphasizing color purity and viewing angles.

---

Picture Quality Comparison

Contrast and Black Levels

• LG NanoCell 99 Series: The NanoCell 99 uses an IPS panel with FALD, offering decent contrast for an LCD TV, with a contrast ratio around 1,000:1. However, IPS panels inherently produce grayish blacks compared to VA panels, making dark-room performance less impressive. Local dimming helps but can’t match OLED or high-end QLED contrast.
• Samsung QN90B: The QN90B’s VA panel and Mini-LED backlight deliver a high contrast ratio (around 29,500:1) and deep blacks for an LCD TV. Its advanced local dimming minimizes blooming, providing excellent control in dark scenes, though it doesn’t achieve the perfect blacks of OLED.

Winner: Samsung QN90B for its superior contrast and black levels, ideal for dark-room viewing.

Brightness

• Samsung QN90B: The QN90B is exceptionally bright, reaching up to 2,000 nits in HDR, making it one of the brightest 4K TVs available. This ensures vibrant highlights and excellent performance in bright rooms, effectively combating glare.
• LG NanoCell 99 Series: The NanoCell 99 achieves moderate brightness, around 500–600 nits in HDR, which is lower than premium QLEDs and Mini-LED TVs. While its anti-reflective coating helps in bright rooms, it struggles in extremely well-lit environments compared to the QN90B.

Winner: Samsung QN90B for its significantly higher brightness, perfect for bright living rooms.

Color Performance

• LG NanoCell 99 Series: NanoCell technology uses nanoparticles to filter impure colors, delivering a wide color gamut (over 90% of DCI-P3) and pure, accurate colors. It supports Dolby Vision, enhancing HDR performance with dynamic metadata for richer colors.
• Samsung QN90B: The QN90B’s quantum dot technology also provides a wide color gamut (99.68% of Rec. 709 in testing), with vibrant and accurate colors. It supports HDR10+ but lacks Dolby Vision, slightly limiting its HDR flexibility. Color accuracy requires tweaking for optimal results.

Winner: LG NanoCell 99 Series for its purer colors and Dolby Vision support, enhancing HDR content.

Viewing Angles

• LG NanoCell 99 Series: The IPS panel offers wide viewing angles, maintaining color and contrast consistency even at off-center positions. This makes it ideal for group viewing or rooms with spread-out seating.
• Samsung QN90B: The QN90B’s VA panel typically has narrower viewing angles, but Samsung’s Ultra Viewing Angle layer improves performance, making it competitive with IPS panels. However, it still falls short of the NanoCell’s consistency at extreme angles (except in 43” and 50” models, which lack this layer).

Winner: LG NanoCell 99 Series for its wider, more consistent viewing angles, ideal for group settings.

Motion Handling and Gaming

• LG NanoCell 99 Series: The NanoCell 99 features a 120Hz refresh rate, HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, and G-Sync/FreeSync, making it gaming-friendly. Its response time (around 10–15ms) is decent but slower than OLED, resulting in slight motion blur in fast-paced games.
• Samsung QN90B: The QN90B also supports 4K/120Hz, VRR, ALLM, and FreeSync across four HDMI 2.1 ports, with a faster response time (around 6–8ms). Its Samsung Gaming Hub adds cloud gaming support (e.g., Xbox Game Pass, GeForce Now), enhancing versatility. However, it lacks G-Sync.

Winner: Samsung QN90B for its faster response time and gaming hub, ideal for gamers.

Burn-In Risk

• LG NanoCell 99 Series: As an LCD-based TV, it’s immune to burn-in, making it safe for static content like news tickers or game HUDs.
• Samsung QN90B: Similarly, the QN90B is immune to burn-in, offering reliability for users with static content needs.

Winner: Tie. Both TVs are burn-in-free, suitable for varied usage.

Resolution: 4K vs. 8K

• LG NanoCell 99 Series: As an 8K TV, it offers higher resolution (7680×4320), providing sharper details for large screens or close viewing. However, native 8K content is scarce, relying heavily on upscaling, which is handled well by LG’s α9 Gen 4 processor.
• Samsung QN90B: A 4K TV (3840×2160), it delivers excellent upscaling via Samsung’s Neo Quantum Processor 4K but lacks the pixel density of 8K. For most viewers at typical distances, the resolution difference is negligible.

Winner: LG NanoCell 99 Series for its 8K resolution, though its benefits are limited by content availability.

---

Cost Comparison

Pricing varies by size and availability, but here’s a general comparison based on 2025 market trends for a 65-inch model (noting the NanoCell 99 is 8K, which affects pricing):

• Samsung QLED QN90B (65”): Retails around $1,300–$1,600, often discounted as a 2022 model. Its 4K resolution and Mini-LED technology make it a premium yet accessible option.
• LG NanoCell 99 Series (65” 8K): Priced higher, around $2,000–$3,500, reflecting its 8K resolution and advanced NanoCell technology. Its premium cost targets early adopters of 8K.

Winner: Samsung QN90B for its lower cost, offering strong value for a high-performance 4K TV.

---

Additional Considerations

Smart Features and Software

• LG NanoCell 99 Series: Runs on webOS, a user-friendly platform with a wide app selection, AirPlay 2, and HomeKit support. The Magic Remote enhances navigation, though it’s less intuitive than some competitors.
• Samsung QN90B: Uses Tizen OS, a polished platform with a robust app ecosystem, including Samsung TV Plus and a Gaming Hub for cloud gaming. The Solar Cell remote is eco-friendly and user-friendly.

Winner: Samsung QN90B for its sleeker Tizen OS and Gaming Hub, though both platforms are excellent.

Sound Quality

• LG NanoCell 99 Series: Features Dolby Atmos and 2.2-channel speakers (40W), offering decent audio with virtual surround sound. A soundbar is recommended for immersive experiences.
• Samsung QN90B: Includes Object Tracking Sound (OTS) and 4.2.2-channel speakers (60W), providing dynamic audio that tracks on-screen action. It’s slightly more immersive but still benefits from external audio.

Winner: Samsung QN90B for its more powerful and dynamic audio.

Durability and Longevity

• LG NanoCell 99 Series: LCD panels are durable with no burn-in risk, but IPS panels may show slight degradation in black levels over time compared to VA panels.
• Samsung QN90B: The QN90B’s VA panel and Mini-LED backlight offer excellent durability and consistent performance, with no burn-in risk.

Winner: Samsung QN90B for its more robust contrast retention over time.

---

Final Verdict: Which TV Wins?

The Samsung QLED QN90B is the superior choice for overall picture quality and versatility, offering exceptional brightness, high contrast, fast response times, and gaming features. It excels in bright rooms, delivers deeper blacks than most LCD TVs, and is more affordable, making it a well-rounded option for most viewers. Its 4K resolution is sufficient for current content, and its Gaming Hub adds value for gamers.

The LG NanoCell 99 Series shines in color purity, wide viewing angles, and 8K resolution, making it ideal for group viewing and early adopters of future-proof technology. However, its lower brightness, weaker contrast, and higher price limit its appeal compared to the QN90B, especially given the scarcity of 8K content.

Target Audience

• Samsung QLED QN90B: Best for home theater enthusiasts, gamers (especially console and cloud gamers), and those with bright living rooms or mixed lighting conditions. If you want premium 4K performance at a reasonable price, the QN90B is the choice.
• LG NanoCell 99 Series: Ideal for tech enthusiasts seeking 8K resolution, group viewing in rooms with wide seating arrangements, or users prioritizing color accuracy with Dolby Vision. It suits those willing to pay a premium for future-proofing.

The Winner

The Samsung QLED QN90B takes the crown for its superior brightness, contrast, gaming performance, and value, making it the better choice for most buyers in 2025. The LG NanoCell 99 Series is a strong contender for those prioritizing 8K resolution and wide viewing angles, but its higher cost and limited 8K content make it less practical for the average consumer. Choose based on your viewing environment, budget, and whether 8K is a priority.

AURORA’S QUEST MONDAY 11TH AUGUST 2025 FULL EPISODE PART 1 AND PART 2 COMBINED

Samsung QLED Q60A vs. LG OLED C1: A Detailed Comparison of Quality, Cost, and Performance

When choosing a high-quality 4K TV, Samsung’s QLED Q60A and LG’s OLED C1 are two compelling options from 2021 that cater to different preferences and budgets. While both TVs deliver impressive visuals, their underlying technologies—QLED for Samsung and OLED for LG—create distinct differences in picture quality, performance, and cost. This article compares the Samsung QLED Q60A and LG OLED C1, focusing on quality, cost, and their target audiences, before concluding with a final verdict on which TV comes out on top.

---

Understanding the Technologies

Samsung QLED Q60A

The Samsung QLED Q60A is an entry-level QLED TV that uses a VA (Vertical Alignment) LCD panel enhanced with a quantum dot layer. This layer improves color accuracy and vibrancy, while the LED backlight provides solid brightness. As part of Samsung’s 2021 lineup, the Q60A is designed to offer a balance of performance and affordability, making it a popular choice for casual viewers and budget-conscious buyers seeking a QLED experience.

LG OLED C1

The LG OLED C1, a mid-range OLED TV from 2021, features a self-emissive OLED panel where each pixel generates its own light. This allows for perfect blacks, infinite contrast ratios, and wide viewing angles. The C1 is packed with advanced features, including gaming optimizations, making it a favorite among cinephiles and gamers who prioritize premium picture quality.

---

Picture Quality Comparison

Contrast and Black Levels

• LG OLED C1: The OLED panel in the C1 produces perfect blacks by turning off individual pixels completely, resulting in a near-infinite contrast ratio. This eliminates light bleed and halo effects, delivering stunning depth in dark scenes, ideal for movies and HDR content in dimly lit rooms.
• Samsung QLED Q60A: The Q60A’s VA panel offers decent contrast for an LCD-based TV, but it cannot match the OLED’s perfect blacks. Without local dimming in most configurations, dark scenes may appear as dark grays, and some light bleed can occur, reducing the impact of HDR content.

Winner: LG OLED C1 for its unparalleled black levels and contrast, perfect for cinematic viewing.

Brightness

• Samsung QLED Q60A: The Q60A is brighter than the C1, with peak brightness around 500–600 nits, making it better suited for moderately lit rooms. Its quantum dot layer enhances color brightness, ensuring vibrant visuals even in ambient light. However, its brightness is lower than premium QLED models like the QN90A.
• LG OLED C1: The C1’s OLED panel reaches around 400–412 nits in peak brightness, which is lower than many QLEDs. While sufficient for most viewing scenarios, it performs best in controlled or dimly lit environments, as its reflective glass front can struggle with glare in bright rooms.

Winner: Samsung QLED Q60A for its brighter display, ideal for well-lit spaces.

Color Accuracy and Vibrancy

• LG OLED C1: The C1 delivers accurate colors with a wide color gamut, covering nearly 100% of DCI-P3. Its self-emissive pixels ensure precise color reproduction, particularly in dark scenes, though it may not appear as vibrant in bright content compared to QLEDs. Its Delta-E color accuracy score of 1.8 indicates excellent fidelity.
• Samsung QLED Q60A: The Q60A’s quantum dot technology produces a wide color gamut and vibrant colors, also covering nearly 100% of DCI-P3. It scores slightly better in color accuracy (Delta-E of 1.5) out of the box, but colors can appear washed out at wide angles due to its VA panel.

Winner: Tie. Both TVs offer excellent color performance, with the C1 excelling in accuracy and the Q60A in vibrancy.

Viewing Angles

• LG OLED C1: The C1’s OLED panel provides near-perfect viewing angles, maintaining color and contrast consistency even when viewed from extreme angles. This makes it ideal for group viewing or larger rooms with varied seating arrangements.
• Samsung QLED Q60A: The Q60A’s VA panel suffers from narrow viewing angles, causing color shifts and contrast loss when viewed off-axis. This limits its suitability for group settings unless viewers are seated directly in front.

Winner: LG OLED C1 for superior viewing angles, perfect for communal viewing.

Motion Handling and Gaming

• LG OLED C1: The C1 is a gaming powerhouse, featuring a near-instantaneous response time, a 120Hz refresh rate, and four HDMI 2.1 ports supporting VRR, ALLM, and 4K@120Hz. These features ensure smooth motion and minimal input lag, making it ideal for next-gen consoles like the PS5 and Xbox Series X. It also supports Dolby Vision for enhanced HDR gaming.
• Samsung QLED Q60A: The Q60A has a 60Hz refresh rate and lacks HDMI 2.1, limiting its gaming capabilities to 4K@60Hz. It offers low input lag and decent motion handling but misses out on VRR and advanced gaming features. Its pixel response time is good but slower than OLED.

Winner: LG OLED C1 for its superior gaming features and motion handling.

Burn-In Risk

• LG OLED C1: OLEDs are susceptible to burn-in, where static images (e.g., game HUDs or channel logos) can leave permanent marks if displayed for extended periods. LG mitigates this with features like pixel shifting and deuterium-based panels, but the risk remains for heavy gamers or news viewers.
• Samsung QLED Q60A: As an LCD-based TV, the Q60A is immune to burn-in, making it a safer choice for users who display static content for long periods, such as in commercial settings or for gaming with persistent HUDs.

Winner: Samsung QLED Q60A for its burn-in immunity, appealing to users with static content.

---

Cost Comparison

Samsung QLED Q60A

• Price Range: The Q60A is an entry-level QLED, with prices in 2021 starting at approximately $650 for a 43-inch model, $850 for a 55-inch, and $1,300 for a 75-inch. Its affordability makes it accessible to budget-conscious buyers seeking QLED technology.
• Value Proposition: The Q60A offers vibrant colors and decent brightness at a lower cost than OLEDs, but its lack of local dimming and advanced gaming features limits its premium appeal. It’s a strong value for casual viewers.

LG OLED C1

• Price Range: The C1, as a mid-range OLED, is pricier, with 2021 prices starting at $1,299 for a 48-inch model, $1,799 for a 55-inch, and $2,499 for a 65-inch. Larger sizes, like the 77-inch ($3,799) and 83-inch ($5,999), command a significant premium.
• Value Proposition: The C1’s higher cost is justified by its superior picture quality, gaming features, and sleek design. It appeals to buyers willing to invest in a premium home theater experience.

Winner: Samsung QLED Q60A for its affordability and better value for budget buyers.

---

Additional Considerations

Energy Efficiency

• LG OLED C1: OLEDs are more energy-efficient in dark scenes, as unlit pixels consume no power. However, bright scenes increase consumption.
• Samsung QLED Q60A: The Q60A’s constant backlight leads to higher power consumption, especially in bright settings.
  Winner: LG OLED C1 for better energy efficiency in most scenarios.

Smart Features

• LG OLED C1: Runs on webOS, a user-friendly platform with a Magic Remote for intuitive navigation. It supports ThinQ AI, Google Assistant, Alexa, and a wide range of streaming apps.
• Samsung QLED Q60A: Uses Tizen OS, known for its smooth interface and SmartThings integration for smart home control. It supports Bixby, Alexa, and Google Assistant (via third-party devices).
  Winner: Tie. Both platforms are robust and offer similar functionality.

Durability and Longevity

• LG OLED C1: OLED panels have a long lifespan (LG claims 54 years at 5 hours daily), but burn-in risk can affect longevity for specific use cases.
• Samsung QLED Q60A: The Q60A’s LCD panel is durable and burn-in-free, offering reliable long-term performance for varied usage.
  Winner: Samsung QLED Q60A for greater durability.

---

Final Verdict: Which Is Better?

The Winner: LG OLED C1

The LG OLED C1 emerges as the clear winner due to its superior picture quality, characterized by perfect blacks, infinite contrast, and wide viewing angles, making it ideal for cinematic experiences and group viewing. Its gaming features, including HDMI 2.1, VRR, and low input lag, make it a top choice for gamers using next-gen consoles. The C1’s sleek design and versatile performance across various content types solidify its position as a premium TV.

However, the Samsung QLED Q60A is a compelling alternative for budget-conscious buyers. Its brighter display, vibrant colors, and burn-in immunity make it suitable for well-lit rooms and users who prioritize affordability and durability over premium features. While it lacks the C1’s contrast and gaming capabilities, it offers excellent value for casual viewing.

Target Audience

• LG OLED C1: Ideal for movie enthusiasts, home theater aficionados, and competitive gamers who watch in controlled or dimly lit environments and prioritize perfect blacks, contrast, and gaming performance. It’s best for those willing to pay a premium and manage burn-in risks.
• Samsung QLED Q60A: Suited for budget-conscious buyers, families, or casual viewers in bright living spaces who want vibrant colors and a burn-in-free experience. It’s perfect for sports, general entertainment, or static content like news channels, especially for viewers seated directly in front.

Final Thoughts

The choice between the Samsung QLED Q60A and LG OLED C1 hinges on your budget, viewing environment, and priorities. If you seek the ultimate picture quality and gaming experience and can afford the higher price, the LG OLED C1 is the superior choice. However, for those prioritizing affordability, brightness, and durability in a bright room, the Samsung QLED Q60A delivers solid performance at a lower cost. Both TVs cater to different needs, ensuring a great viewing experience for their respective audiences.

AURORA’S QUEST FRIDAY 8TH AUGUST 2025 FULL EPISODE PART 1 AND PART 2 COMBINED

The Sammsunng Galaxy A89: A Fake Phone Flooding the Kenyan Market

The Kenyan smartphone market, a vibrant hub for both budget-friendly and premium devices, is increasingly targeted by counterfeit products. Among these, the so-called “Sammsunng Galaxy A89” has emerged as a prevalent fake phone, exploiting the popularity of Samsung’s Galaxy A-series. This article explains why the Sammsunng Galaxy A89 is a counterfeit device, identifies the original Samsung model it attempts to emulate, and provides practical guidance for Kenyan consumers to avoid purchasing fake phones. Additionally, we’ll share links to trusted retailers where authentic Samsung smartphones can be purchased.

---

Why the Sammsunng Galaxy A89 Is a Fake Phone

The Sammsunng Galaxy A89 is not a legitimate model in Samsung’s official product lineup. Several factors confirm its counterfeit status:

1. Misspelled Brand Name:
   The name “Sammsunng” with an extra “m” and “g” is a clear indicator of a fake. The authentic brand is spelled “Samsung.” Counterfeiters frequently use slight spelling variations to mimic the original brand while evading legal scrutiny, relying on convincing packaging to deceive buyers. This tactic aligns with reports of fake Samsung phones labeled as “Sammsung” or “Fedioli” on platforms like Alibaba.
2. Non-Existent Model:
   Samsung’s Galaxy A-series includes models like the Galaxy A35, A55, and A56 5G, but there is no Galaxy A89 in the company’s catalog, as verified on Samsung’s official website (www.samsung.com) and by retailers like Phone Place Kenya. The “A89” name is a fabricated attempt to sound like a high-end or futuristic A-series model, confusing consumers familiar with Samsung’s budget-friendly lineup.
3. Substandard Build and Specifications:
   Fake Sammsunng Galaxy A89 phones typically feature inferior materials, such as cheap plastic bodies, low-resolution LCD displays, and weak processors (e.g., outdated MediaTek chips). These devices may mimic the A-series’ sleek design or camera layout but deliver poor performance, with issues like lagging, low-quality cameras, or unreliable battery life. Reports of fake Samsung phones, such as a counterfeit S23 Ultra priced at $43.50 on Alibaba, highlight inferior hardware like low-resolution screens, a common trait of fakes.
4. Inauthentic Software and Security Risks:
   Genuine Samsung phones run on One UI (e.g., One UI 7 on Android 15 for recent models), offering a secure and optimized experience. Fake Sammsunng Galaxy A89 devices often use generic or modified Android versions with a One UI-like skin, sometimes embedded with malware or intrusive apps. A YouTube analysis of fake Samsung S23 Ultra phones noted pre-installed apps and laggy performance, indicating security risks. These fakes lack Samsung’s software updates and features like Galaxy AI, posing risks to user data.
5. Proliferation in Kenya:
   Kenya’s smartphone market is a hotspot for counterfeit devices, with up to 40% of phones estimated to be fake, costing the economy billions in evaded taxes. In 2019, the Anti-Counterfeit Authority (ACA) seized counterfeit Samsung phones worth over KSh 10 million in Nairobi, highlighting the issue’s scale in markets like Mfangano Street. The Sammsunng Galaxy A89 is part of this wave, distributed through unregulated channels like street vendors, unverified online marketplaces (e.g., Facebook Marketplace, Jiji.co.ke), and platforms like Alibaba, which list “fake Samsung phones” explicitly.

---

The Original Phone the Sammsunng Galaxy A89 Is Trying to Emulate

The fake Sammsunng Galaxy A89 likely attempts to emulate the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G, a mid-range smartphone expected to be released in early 2026 as part of Samsung’s A-series. The Galaxy A56 5G is anticipated to offer 5G connectivity, a Super AMOLED display, and a versatile camera system, making it a popular choice in Kenya’s mid-range market. The “A89” name is a fabricated variation to sound like a higher-tier A-series model, confusing buyers. Since the Galaxy A56 5G is unreleased, we’ll reference its expected specifications based on industry leaks and the A-series’ trajectory (e.g., from Gadgets Leo):

• Display: 6.6-inch Super AMOLED, Full HD+ resolution (1080 x 2400 pixels), 120Hz refresh rate
• Processor: Exynos 1580 or Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (region-dependent), Octa-core
• RAM/Storage: 6GB/128GB, 8GB/128GB, or 8GB/256GB, expandable via microSDXC
• Camera: Triple rear setup (50MP main with f/1.8 + 8MP ultra-wide + 5MP macro), 13MP front camera
• Battery: 5000mAh with 25W fast charging
• OS: Android 15 with One UI 7
• Other Features: 5G support, IP67 water and dust resistance, in-display fingerprint sensor
• Price in Kenya: Approximately KSh 45,000–55,000 (projected based on A55 pricing)

The fake Sammsunng Galaxy A89 may mimic the A56 5G’s design, such as its flat AMOLED display or triple-camera module, but typically features inferior components, like LCD screens, weaker processors, and poor cameras. Counterfeiters may falsely advertise 5G or fast charging, which are either non-functional or absent in fakes.

---

Why the Fake Sammsunng Galaxy A89 Is Flooding the Kenyan Market

Several factors contribute to the proliferation of fake Sammsunng Galaxy A89 phones in Kenya:

1. Samsung’s Popularity in Kenya:
   Samsung is a leading brand in Kenya, with its A-series known for balancing affordability and premium features. Counterfeiters exploit this by producing fake models like the Sammsunng Galaxy A89, leveraging the A-series’ reputation. Retailers like Gadgets Leo note Samsung’s dominance in Kenya’s smartphone market.
2. Price-Sensitive Market:
   The Galaxy A56 5G is expected to cost around KSh 45,000–55,000, while fake Sammsunng Galaxy A89 phones are sold at significantly lower prices (e.g., KSh 10,000–20,000). This affordability appeals to budget-conscious buyers. Listings for counterfeit Samsung phones on Alibaba at prices as low as $43.50 highlight the price disparity driving demand for fakes.
3. Unregulated Sales Channels:
   Counterfeit phones are distributed through street vendors, unofficial retailers, or unverified online platforms like Facebook Marketplace, Jiji.co.ke, or Alibaba. These channels lack proper documentation or warranties, enabling the spread of fakes. The ACA’s 2019 raids in Nairobi underscore the prevalence of counterfeit Samsung phones in unregulated markets.
4. Consumer Unawareness:
   Many buyers are unaware of how to verify a phone’s authenticity, especially when counterfeiters use convincing packaging. The misspelling of “Sammsunng” and the fictitious “A89” name may go unnoticed, particularly by first-time buyers. Reports note that counterfeit phones often fool consumers with cloned IMEI numbers and realistic packaging.

---

How to Avoid Buying Fake Phones in Kenya

To protect yourself from purchasing a counterfeit Sammsunng Galaxy A89 or other fake smartphones, follow these practical steps, informed by Samsung’s guidelines and industry best practices:

1. Verify the IMEI and Serial Number:
   Every smartphone has a unique 15-digit IMEI number. To confirm authenticity:

• Dial *#06# on the phone to display the IMEI.
• Text the IMEI to 1555, a free service provided by the Communications Authority of Kenya, to verify the phone’s legitimacy. You’ll receive an SMS with the phone’s make and model (e.g., Samsung Galaxy A56 5G).
• Visit Samsung’s official website (www.samsung.com) or use IMEIcheck.net to enter the IMEI and confirm the device’s model and warranty status. Ensure the IMEI and serial number match those on the box, receipt, and in Settings > About Phone. Discrepancies or invalid numbers indicate a fake.

1. Purchase from Authorized Retailers:
   Buy Samsung phones only from reputable stores or Samsung-authorized resellers. Avoid street vendors or unverified online sellers like Facebook Marketplace, Jiji.co.ke, or Alibaba, which list “fake Samsung phones” explicitly. Trusted retailers provide warranties and authentic products. Samsung recommends purchasing from authorized dealers like Phone Place Kenya or Fonexpress. See the list of stores below.
2. Check Specifications and Software:
   Research the phone’s specifications on Samsung’s official website (www.samsung.com) before purchasing. Ensure the device runs One UI (e.g., One UI 7 on Android 15 for the A56 5G) and matches the listed specs, such as the 50MP camera or Exynos 1580 processor. Be cautious of phones with generic Android interfaces or pre-installed apps with ads. Use Samsung’s diagnostic tool by dialing #0# to test hardware components like the display; if the tool doesn’t launch, the phone is likely fake. Download the Samsung Members app to run diagnostics and confirm authenticity.
3. Inspect Build Quality and Packaging:
   Genuine Samsung phones feature premium materials like Gorilla Glass and aluminum. Look for signs of a fake, such as:

• Misspelled branding (e.g., “Sammsunng” instead of “Samsung”)
• Low-quality packaging with uneven seams or spelling errors
• Low-resolution LCD displays instead of AMOLED
• Poor camera quality or non-functional features
• Compare the box and phone with images on Samsung’s website. Genuine A-series boxes have tamper-evident seals and high-quality printing.

1. Test Hardware and Camera:
   The Galaxy A56 5G is expected to feature a 50MP camera and 5G connectivity. Test the camera by taking photos; blurry or low-quality results indicate a fake. Check connectivity (e.g., 5G, Wi-Fi) and performance with demanding apps. Use apps like CPU-Z or AnTuTu after a factory reset to verify hardware (e.g., Exynos 1580, not MediaTek).
2. Demand a Warranty and Receipt:
   Authentic Samsung phones come with a one-year warranty (or two years in some regions) and a proper receipt. Verify the warranty status on Samsung’s website and ensure the receipt matches the phone’s details, including the model and IMEI. Fake phones typically lack warranties or have forged receipts.
3. Be Skeptical of Unrealistic Prices:
   If a “Sammsunng Galaxy A89” is priced significantly lower than the Galaxy A56 5G (e.g., KSh 10,000 vs. KSh 45,000), it’s likely a fake. Compare prices with trusted retailers. Listings on Alibaba for “Samsung” phones at $43.50 are clear scams.

---

Where to Buy the Original Samsung Galaxy A56 5G in Kenya

Since the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G is expected to launch in early 2026, it may not yet be widely available. However, once released, it can be purchased from these trusted retailers known for stocking genuine Samsung phones:

1. Jumia Kenya (www.jumia.co.ke):
   Jumia offers authentic Samsung smartphones, including A-series models, with warranties and cash-on-delivery options. The Galaxy A56 5G is expected to cost around KSh 45,000–55,000.
2. Phone Place Kenya (www.phoneplacekenya.com):
   Phone Place Kenya, an official Samsung dealer, stocks genuine Galaxy phones, with fast delivery (1–2 hours in Nairobi, 24 hours countrywide) and a two-year warranty.
3. Samsung Brand Store Kenya (samsung.brandcart.co.ke):
   This official Samsung store offers authentic Galaxy phones with discounts up to KSh 37,000 and warranties.
4. Patabay Kenya (patabay.co.ke):
   Patabay provides genuine Samsung phones with payment on delivery in Nairobi and nationwide shipping, starting at KSh 8,500 for budget models.
5. Avechi Kenya (avechi.co.ke):
   Avechi offers authentic Samsung phones, including A-series models, with secure payments and discounts.
6. Gadgets Leo (gadgetsleo.com):
   Gadgets Leo provides genuine Samsung phones with online ordering and same-day delivery in Nairobi. The Galaxy A56 5G is expected to be available post-launch.
7. GrandHub Technologies Ltd (grandhub.co.ke):
   A leading Samsung dealer in Kenya, GrandHub stocks authentic Galaxy phones with competitive pricing and warranties. Contact: 0705126957.

Before purchasing, confirm the phone model (Samsung Galaxy A56 5G, not Sammsunng Galaxy A89) and verify its authenticity using the IMEI check and other methods outlined above.

---

Conclusion

The Sammsunng Galaxy A89 is a counterfeit smartphone that does not exist in Samsung’s official lineup, likely designed to mimic the anticipated Samsung Galaxy A56 5G. Its proliferation in the Kenyan market exploits Samsung’s popularity and the demand for affordable, feature-rich smartphones, but these fakes offer poor performance, security risks, and no official support. To avoid such scams, Kenyan consumers should verify the IMEI through the Communications Authority of Kenya and Samsung’s website, purchase from trusted retailers like Jumia, Phone Place Kenya, or GrandHub Technologies, and inspect the device for signs of authenticity, such as One UI and AMOLED displays. By staying vigilant and informed, you can confidently invest in genuine Samsung smartphones that deliver the quality, performance, and innovation the brand is known for.

AURORA’S QUEST THURSDAY 7TH AUGUST 2025 FULL EPISODE PART 1 AND PART 2 COMBINED